2019
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: Outcomes from a vicious circle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, while the exceptionally low Dutch estimate (0.2: Lavrijsen et al, 2005) was obtained on the basis of studying nursing homes only, a later Dutch study encompassing nursing homes, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and hospices, revealed an even lower estimate close to 0.15 (van Erp et al, 2015). These differences can probably be attributed to different thresholds existing in different countries for termination of life-sustaining measures in UWS or in coma preceding UWS (van Erp et al, 2020). As regards children, more than 25 years ago Ashwal et al (1992) estimated the prevalence of UWS (vegetative state) as 0.63 per 100 000 but supposed in their discussion that the real number must be somewhat higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, while the exceptionally low Dutch estimate (0.2: Lavrijsen et al, 2005) was obtained on the basis of studying nursing homes only, a later Dutch study encompassing nursing homes, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and hospices, revealed an even lower estimate close to 0.15 (van Erp et al, 2015). These differences can probably be attributed to different thresholds existing in different countries for termination of life-sustaining measures in UWS or in coma preceding UWS (van Erp et al, 2020). As regards children, more than 25 years ago Ashwal et al (1992) estimated the prevalence of UWS (vegetative state) as 0.63 per 100 000 but supposed in their discussion that the real number must be somewhat higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…First of all, PDOC represent a dramatic condition in itself with a sudden and huge impact on both patients and their families. PDOC are generally considered to have a poor outcome [11][12][13][14][15]. UWS has even been described as 'a fate worse than death' [16].…”
Section: Challenges In Pdoc-carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…PDOC confronts families with complex intertwined feelings of grief, hope and ambiguous loss at the same time [ 17 , 18 ]. Secondly, a low worldwide prevalence for UWS of 0.2 to 6.1 per 100.000 individuals of the total population makes it difficult for clinicians to master the required diagnostic and therapeutic expertise [ 2 , 11 , 19 ]. Third, there is a consistent high misdiagnosis rate of ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue, Willemijn van Erp and colleagues describe the outcomes of a nationwide cohort of patients in the Netherlands diagnosed with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), better known in the United States as vegetative state (VS) . Outcomes of this cohort were noteworthy for 2 findings: the nearly complete absence of referrals to multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation centers at hospital discharge, and that half of the patients died from withdrawing medically provided hydration and nutrition—a decision triggered most often by an intercurrent illness—which was a mode of death that increased in frequency during the study period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors scrutinized the process of care of UWS/VS patients and identified a series of deficiencies they grouped into 3 categories that comprised a “vicious circle”: (1) epidemiological limitations resulting from diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty given the small number of patients, (2) suboptimal treatment of these patients because of disorganized systems of care, and (3) suboptimal clinical decision‐making that favored allowing them to die by withdrawing medically administered hydration and nutrition. To address these deficiencies, the authors recommended interventions to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis, improve the systematization of care, and improve critical decision‐making to enhance the quality of medical treatment …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%