2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling the correlates of species richness and ecological uniqueness in a metacommunity of urban pond insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
40
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that sites with low species richness were the most unique (Table ), a pattern also originally observed by Legendre & De Cáceres (), supporting the idea that site uniqueness is not synonymous with high species richness, but rather is indicative of a biota that is uncommon at other sites. This finding is similar to those of other studies (Heino & Grönroos, ; Heino et al., ; Vilmi, Karjalainen, & Heino, ) and, in general, indicates the importance of beta diversity to conservation planning (Socolar, Gilroy, Kunin, & Edwards, ). Such uncommon or more unique biotas are associated mainly with soils with lower clay content, which are present in the lowlands of the Ducke Reserve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that sites with low species richness were the most unique (Table ), a pattern also originally observed by Legendre & De Cáceres (), supporting the idea that site uniqueness is not synonymous with high species richness, but rather is indicative of a biota that is uncommon at other sites. This finding is similar to those of other studies (Heino & Grönroos, ; Heino et al., ; Vilmi, Karjalainen, & Heino, ) and, in general, indicates the importance of beta diversity to conservation planning (Socolar, Gilroy, Kunin, & Edwards, ). Such uncommon or more unique biotas are associated mainly with soils with lower clay content, which are present in the lowlands of the Ducke Reserve.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To our knowledge, no study has thus far analysed patterns of ecological uniqueness of several taxonomic groups sampled at the same sites. We also note that few studies have modelled the LCBD values, even in the univariate case (Heino et al., ; Legendre & De Cáceres, ; da Silva & Hernández, ). Our study is the first attempt to understand the ecological uniqueness values estimated for several biological groups by analysing the variation in LCBD values in a single analysis, rather than conducting a separate analysis for each biological group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It thus appears that among the autotrophs, taxonomically unique species‐poor communities prevail in specific ecological conditions, such as those found in acidic ponds. The negative LCBD–richness correlation observed here has been reported previously for larger organisms, such as freshwater fish (Legendre & De Cáceres, ) and urban pond insects (Heino et al, ). However, we also observed a positive relationship between LCBD and richness for non‐cyanobacteria, which clearly suggested that the negative LCBD–richness correlation is not a general rule when multiple taxa are considered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Walls and buildings provide complex and impermeable vertical structures, and roads are a source of invertebrate mortality (from road traffic) as well as a physical barrier, which reduces the opportunity for successful dispersal and colonisation of macroinvertebrates. Complex structural mosaics may limit dispersal to such an extent that macroinvertebrate communities in some urban ponds may be separated from any species pool effect (spatial effects) on local communities (Heino et al 2017). However, many urban ponds exist in networks, where they are linked through urban parks/nature reserves and blue/green corridors (Dallimer et al 2012;Hassall 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been increasing research on nestedness and turnover in non-urban areas (e.g., Brendonck et al 2015;Viana et al 2016) there has been little research attention focussed on the organisation of beta-diversity in highly disturbed environments such as urban ponds. Urban ponds may demonstrate a different spatial organisation of biodiversity compared to non-urban ponds given the very different architecture and levels of disturbance (Heino et al 2017). Examining and understanding beta-diversity within and among pond assemblages within urban settlements could inform the future placement and design of sites, supporting networks of protected aquatic habitats (city parks or urban wildlife conservation areas) and the management of invasive species within urban areas at an inter-city scale (Socolar et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%