2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-020-02010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the camel rumen microbiome through metaculturomics approach for agriculture waste hydrolytic potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cellulase and xylanase production is inducible as it depends on various factors such as inoculum size, pH value, temperature, medium additives, fermentation time, and growth substrate [12,23,26,28,63]. Xylanase and cellulase productions were in the range indicated by similar studies [64][65][66] for rumen bacteria. On the other hand, the anaerobic bacterial community in this study produced more xylanase and cellulase than the aerobic fungi [67] and anaerobic rumen fungi of the camel gut [26].…”
Section: Enzymes Productionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Cellulase and xylanase production is inducible as it depends on various factors such as inoculum size, pH value, temperature, medium additives, fermentation time, and growth substrate [12,23,26,28,63]. Xylanase and cellulase productions were in the range indicated by similar studies [64][65][66] for rumen bacteria. On the other hand, the anaerobic bacterial community in this study produced more xylanase and cellulase than the aerobic fungi [67] and anaerobic rumen fungi of the camel gut [26].…”
Section: Enzymes Productionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, understanding of the enzymology of plant cell wall hydrolysis is the key step to the sustainable utilization of cellulosic biomass [36]. Cellulase and xylanase production by rumen inocula (Table 1) from camel and sheep were higher than the production of bacterial cultures isolated from camel rumen by Srivastava et al (2021) [50]. Moreover, cellulase production was similar to the production of some commercial bacterial strains such as E. coli [18] and cellulolytic bacterial consortium [22], which highlight the higher cellulolytic activities of rumen bacteria in sheep and camel.…”
Section: Hydrolysis Of Barely Straw Ethanol and Gas Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En un estudio reciente, realizado por Srivastava y col. [25] demostraron que, las bacterias celulolíticas y hemicelulolíticas del rumen de camello suelen ser excelentes bioprocesadoras celulósicas a partir de residuos agrícolas para la obtención de biocombustibles; y Mateo y col. [14] afirman, que en un cultivo de bacterias ruminales degradadoras de aserrín, un incremento en su degradación in vitro, del 21 y 59,7 %. Arcos y col. [2] encontraron a F. succinogenes aislados de bovinos en pastoreo con mayor capacidad degradativa de pared celular de Bouteloua repens (Navajita rastrera) que la cepa de referencia F. succinogenes ATCC 19169 (13,77 vs. 7,94 %).…”
Section: Bajounclassified