2019
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpredictable Nanoparticle Retention in Commonly Used Plastic Syringes Introduces Dosage Uncertainties That May Compromise the Accuracy of Nanomedicine and Nanotoxicology Studies

Abstract: In recent animal experiments with suspensions of radiolabeled TiO2 nanoparticles large and highly variable radioactivity fractions were retained in disposable plastic syringes. After unloading between 10% and up to 70% of the loaded dose were still present in the syringes. As a consequence the effectively delivered nanoparticle dose to the animals was frequently much smaller than the nominal dose of the nanoparticles loaded into the syringe. The high variability of this nanoparticle retention challenges the ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was underlined the importance of adopting multiple analytical techniques for product characterization to meet the intrinsic complexity of such nanosystems. However, despite scientific findings on different nanosystems suggesting that their retention in syringes might be a quality issue [ 11 ], the in-use stability of LN and/or their compatibility with administration devices has not been documented yet. To fill this gap, LN were primarily characterized by TEM, DLS, and NTA, as these complementary techniques can provide evidence on variations in morphology, size, and size distribution which can drastically change the formulation features, including the dose-to-dose reproducibility, the fate, and the biodistribution of the particles upon injection [ 3 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was underlined the importance of adopting multiple analytical techniques for product characterization to meet the intrinsic complexity of such nanosystems. However, despite scientific findings on different nanosystems suggesting that their retention in syringes might be a quality issue [ 11 ], the in-use stability of LN and/or their compatibility with administration devices has not been documented yet. To fill this gap, LN were primarily characterized by TEM, DLS, and NTA, as these complementary techniques can provide evidence on variations in morphology, size, and size distribution which can drastically change the formulation features, including the dose-to-dose reproducibility, the fate, and the biodistribution of the particles upon injection [ 3 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, studies on the physical stability of nanoparticles in disposable syringes are not available in the literature. At the time of writing, only few data were collected on radiolabeled nanosystems and exosomes demonstrating a certain degree of particle retention into plastic insulin-type syringes [ 11 ]. Comirnaty LN from different batches instead were physically stable in disposable syringes, regardless of the device material, storage temperature, and road transportation since no sign of aggregation or adsorption was detected at 2–25 °C over 24 h ( Table 1 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, cysteine and thiol-containing proteins are found in FBS and have a high affinity for Ag ions and NPs. Ag loss to the container wall could be another reason that we did not get full recovery of Ag, as it was discussed in [ 47 ]. This may lead to decreased Ag ion availability and possible NP surface interactions with the aqueous phase, ultimately reducing toxicity [ 10 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An additional limitation of instillation studies has recently been raised. Holzwarth et al (37) reported that some instillation studies are not able to achieve nominal dose amounts because of the unexpected retention of dosing syringes; the authors pointed out that numerous misleading results have been published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%