1990
DOI: 10.1109/16.43804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpinning the GaAs Fermi level with thin heavily doped silicon overlayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] Pseudomorphic silicon cap layer deposited onto GaAs was reported to unpin the surface Fermi energy 13,15 and reduce the density of tunneling-related traps. [12][13][14] Pseudomorphic silicon cap layer deposited onto GaAs was reported to unpin the surface Fermi energy 13,15 and reduce the density of tunneling-related traps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] Pseudomorphic silicon cap layer deposited onto GaAs was reported to unpin the surface Fermi energy 13,15 and reduce the density of tunneling-related traps. [12][13][14] Pseudomorphic silicon cap layer deposited onto GaAs was reported to unpin the surface Fermi energy 13,15 and reduce the density of tunneling-related traps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, III-V/oxide interfaces are not quite as robust as the Si/SiO 2 one and most of them present rather high densities of interface states. One of the key problems in developing inversion-mode MISFETs is the near midgap Fermi level pinning associated with the high density of states present at the high-κ/III-V interface [66][67][68][69]. The origin of these interface states has been heavily debated on in the past [70] but there are clear indications that a strong relationship exists with native antisite point defects (As Ga or Ga As ) [69], as also evidenced by scanning tunneling microscopy data [71,72].…”
Section: Passivation Of the Gaas Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They associated this effect with incorporation of residual As in the Si interface layer. 7 A possible explanation of the above discrepancy was provided by our recent photoemission and transport results from Al/Si/GaAs͑001͒ diodes, 8,9 which showed that the As and Al fluxes required during Si deposition to produce an effect are much larger than those commonly employed for Si doping purposes, i.e., comparable with, or higher than the Si flux, and presumably higher than those employed by Koyanagi et al 7 Most empirical 6,10 and theoretical models 7,11,12 proposed to explain subsets of the above experimental results consider the electronic structure of the Si interfacial layer as identical to that of bulk Si, require the presence of an As-doped ͑Ga-doped͒ n ϩ (p ϩ ) degenerate Si layer of sufficient thickness at the interface, e.g., to justify tunneling, 6 compensation, 7,10 or metallic screening of the interface states, 12 and assume that the band alignment across the Si-GaAs heterojunction in the Al/Si/GaAs structure is independent of the Si layer thickness. Conversely, no substantial change of the Schottky barrier relative to the Al/n-GaAs͑001͒ case was reportedly observed in Al/Si/n-GaAs͑001͒ structures in which Si layers 10-40 Å thick had been grown under Ga flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%