2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2009.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking the client(s): Constructions, positions and client–consultant dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(see also Alvesson et al, 2009). Clearly, much can lie behind varying assessments, including the possibility of an agreement on the nature of the impact but conflicting views on the quality of the consultants' performance or its desirability.…”
Section: Methodology and Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see also Alvesson et al, 2009). Clearly, much can lie behind varying assessments, including the possibility of an agreement on the nature of the impact but conflicting views on the quality of the consultants' performance or its desirability.…”
Section: Methodology and Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarasvathy and Dew (2005) demonstrate how the interaction between entrepreneurs (who are clients) and stakeholders (who are consultants) is shaped by the participants' identities, aspirations, and accidents of human life, rather than by predictions and rational planning. Alvesson et al (2009) propose that the relationship between client and consult is processual; the positions are shaped by both the client and the consultant, as well as by the impact of identities, culture, and organizational politics.…”
Section: Studies Of Business Advicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With applying the Structuration Theory in this research work it is argued that the client organization is not uniform. Contrary to that, the client organization represents a heterogeneous cluster of actors, interests and inclinations involved in multiple and varied ways in the consulting project [109].…”
Section: Conclusion and Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%