Consultancy's Consequences? A Critical Assessment of Management Consultancy's Impact on Management

Abstract

Much is claimed of management consultancy by critics and celebrants alike. Through shaping and legitimizing ideas and catalysing change, it has impacted on management practice and people's lives more generally. Given the growth of consultancy as an industry and wider activity, few have challenged these views. However, there are good reasons for treating them with some caution. In particular, its impact is exaggerated in geographical scope and confused with that of management ideas in general – consultancy as a scapegoat for management. At the same time, recent changes in both the nature and status of management and of consultancy have rendered traditional boundary distinctions less tenable such that the scope and impact of consultancy may be even greater than is typically assumed. Overall, its impact has been both understated and overstated. I therefore argue for a more cautious and critical approach. This recognizes consultancy as an integral part of management, where its distinctive role lies more in its structural position and ambiguous visibility and accountability than its practices, skills or occupational/professional identity claims. The research agenda thus becomes one of more clearly identifying the consequences of management as well as of consultancy, in part through a consideration of contexts where they are, or were, largely absent.

The change of production systems through consultancy involved projects: a multiple case study in Chinese SMEs

“…Source: Developed by the authors Sturdy (2011) argues that many consultants have a rich working experience in their client organisations' industries and the consultants' involvement can be increased when the project goes on. Hence, the consultants and their clients can share some knowledge (e.g.…”

The role of interim managers in performance improvement: evidence from English local authorities

“…Clients, too, may be motivated by needs beyond operational or strategic input. For example, hiring a consultant can be used as a way of legitimizing decisions that have already been made, or consultants can be hired to carry out the 'dirty work' when unpopular courses of action are undertaken (Kitay and Wright, 2004;Sturdy, 2011). A rigid distinction between internal and external positions is an oversimplification as specialists such as those in HR, IT and law are increasingly subject to 'internal markets' within organizations where they act as external to the team or division they are working for, even if they are employed by the same organization.…”

Reputation and identity conflict in management consulting

“…Consistency is supported by the organization signaling that it is directing its efforts towards meeting the expectations of stakeholders, for example, in terms of product quality, financial performance or as an employer and offers assurance to customers of both reputation and status, particularly where product or service quality is hard to judge ex ante as, for example, in the context of professional service firms (Armbrüster 2004;Sturdy, 2011;Pollock et al, 2015).…”