2013
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(13)00084-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unobserved Heterogeneity in Overeducation Models: Is Personality More Important than Ability?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They implicitly assume that all youths with the same level of education and skills are perfect substitutes in the labor markets and that the assignment of youths between employed and unemployed groups is a totally random process. However, as pointed out by Chevalier (2003) and Tarvid (2013), in addition to observed factors in Zi, some unobserved individual‐ or job‐specific factors might also make the employed youth a better matched or mismatched candidate for the job. For instance, ability and personality attributes as well as the environment in which the youth was born and or brought up have been found to significantly explain mismatch probabilities (Allen & van der Velden, 2001; Chevalier & Lindley, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They implicitly assume that all youths with the same level of education and skills are perfect substitutes in the labor markets and that the assignment of youths between employed and unemployed groups is a totally random process. However, as pointed out by Chevalier (2003) and Tarvid (2013), in addition to observed factors in Zi, some unobserved individual‐ or job‐specific factors might also make the employed youth a better matched or mismatched candidate for the job. For instance, ability and personality attributes as well as the environment in which the youth was born and or brought up have been found to significantly explain mismatch probabilities (Allen & van der Velden, 2001; Chevalier & Lindley, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Personality traits also affect the risk of overeducation and frequently are more important than ability (Blázquez and Budría 2012;Tarvid 2013). Empirical evidence about gender effects has been mixed, with roughly equal number of studies concluding that women have a higher skills mismatch risk than men (Aleksynska and Tritah 2013;Baert et al 2013;Betti et al 2011;Karakaya et al 2007;Ramos and Sanromá 2013;Tani 2012;Verhaest and Omey 2010;Verhaest and Van der Velden 2013) as those finding no difference across sex (Blázquez and Budría 2012;Büchel and van Ham 2003;Chevalier 2003;Chevalier and Lindley 2009;Frei and Sousa-Poza 2012;Frenette 2004;Støslashren and Wiers-Jenssen 2010;Wirz and Atukeren 2005); a few studies result in men being at a relative disadvantage (European Commission 2012;Kiersztyn 2013).…”
Section: Determinants Of Job Polarization and Skills Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personality is another important source of unobserved heterogeneity, but it was used by only two studies in the context of mismatch (Blázquez and Budría 2012;Tarvid 2013). Tarvid (2013) showed that personality is an important predictor of overeducation and frequently performs better than ability.…”
Section: Polarization and Individual-level Skills Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one reason for prolonged studies is that students want to study extensively, and this may guarantee their employment (Dolton & Silles, 2008;. This kind of overeducation can also hinder the smoothness of studies in many levels, such as studies that are too burdensome, consecutive fatigue, and imbalance between studies and other areas of life Sánchez-Sánchez & McGuinness, 2015;Tarvid, 2013). However, for some students, other areas of life may leave studies in the shadow .…”
Section: From Students To Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%