2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1410114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although new members often bring new perspectives, the new perspectives may not be welcomed or respected, leading the newcomers to be overlooked or to feel intimidated (Rink & Ellemers 2015). Newcomers are more likely to be included and heeded if there is a clear shared identity linking the original team and the new member (Kane 2010). …”
Section: Recognizing and Managing Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although new members often bring new perspectives, the new perspectives may not be welcomed or respected, leading the newcomers to be overlooked or to feel intimidated (Rink & Ellemers 2015). Newcomers are more likely to be included and heeded if there is a clear shared identity linking the original team and the new member (Kane 2010). …”
Section: Recognizing and Managing Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information Systems literature highlights the importance of the practical usefulness of the knowledge being shared in achieving innovative and collaborative solutions in multiparty software development teams (Levina, 2005). Similarly, Knowledge Transfer literature views successful knowledge sharing through the lens of the internalization approach (Kane, 2010). Accordingly, knowledge transfer requires both the transmission of the knowledge from the source agent, and its internalization/ learning by the recipient agent (Joshi et al, 2007).…”
Section: High-quality Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it was shown that the motivational considerations of knowledge providers and recipients impacted the way they transferred and used knowledge in a simulated environment [40]. Finally, in an experimental study, it was found that knowledge demonstrability and the similarity of the social identities of the knowledge providers and recipients facilitated knowledge transfer and usage [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the academic and practical importance of knowledge application contexts has long been recognized in the literature [1]. In fact, it was noted that hindrance to knowledge transfer and application (i.e., task closure) in knowledge sharing largely stems from the circumstances surrounding the knowledge recipients [25]. Software development takes place in a multidimensional context, while software developers need to focus on their software development tasks (i.e., task context), they need to constantly interact with their supervisors (i.e., social context), and perform their tasks within a larger institutional setting with both implicit and explicit rules, standards, documents, and metrics (i.e., institutional context).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%