2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
327
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
7
327
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…University-industry relationships typically involve collaborative research, contract research, educational collaboration, personnel mobility, or contracting (D'Este & Patel, 2007;Perkmann et al, 2013). Whereas the importance of the transfer of academic knowledge into the industrial domain has been highlighted in previous research (e.g., Ankrah & Al-Tabbaa, 2015;Perkmann et al, 2013), educational collaboration taking place as a part of university-industry research collaborations is an almost neglected topic. This is surprising, because education and the creation of knowledge is a primary goal of universities, and involvement in academic educational activities is a source of great potential in terms of improving the competences of firms seeking new skills and competences (Santoro & Chakrabarti, 1999) or wishing to develop their own internal capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…University-industry relationships typically involve collaborative research, contract research, educational collaboration, personnel mobility, or contracting (D'Este & Patel, 2007;Perkmann et al, 2013). Whereas the importance of the transfer of academic knowledge into the industrial domain has been highlighted in previous research (e.g., Ankrah & Al-Tabbaa, 2015;Perkmann et al, 2013), educational collaboration taking place as a part of university-industry research collaborations is an almost neglected topic. This is surprising, because education and the creation of knowledge is a primary goal of universities, and involvement in academic educational activities is a source of great potential in terms of improving the competences of firms seeking new skills and competences (Santoro & Chakrabarti, 1999) or wishing to develop their own internal capabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comme on peut le constater, le principe d'homophilie (ou encore les proximités) a un impact managérial significatif puisqu'il vient, au moins en partie, conditionner l'accès des PME aux ressources et capacités externes dont elles ont besoin dans le cadre de leurs projets d'innovation (Grossetti et Bès, 2001). (Ankrah et AL-Tabbaa, 2015 ;Perkmann et al, 2013 ;Bijker, Hughes et Pinch, 2012). Toutefois, le principe d'homophilie et l'analyse des réseaux montrent également qu'il ne s'agit pas là d'une panacée.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This relationship is better explained by expectations of both sides. With reference to Odabaşı et al [2] For the university these expectations are: 4. Creating a persistent knowledge platform and saving it.…”
Section: University and Industry Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa [4] [5] put emphasis on the issue of formalizations importance; increasing formalization and monitoring of the relationship in a UIC could lead to conflict and distrust among parties. For universities accessing the researching fund is the most dominating motive [4]. For this reason universities are likely to be in a vulnerable position because they have less power and control over the agreement.…”
Section: University and Industry Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation