2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-49289-5_67-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universelle und selektive Prävention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What are the reasons for the preponderance of studies in the field of targeted prevention compared to universal prevention of NSSI? The higher expected effect sizes for prevention in patients compared to universal prevention programs [where effect sizes have been recently shown to range between d = 0.07 and d = 0.40 ( 33 )] may be one factor ( 34 ). Moreover, targeted prevention shows higher feasibility, as it can occur in a controlled, clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What are the reasons for the preponderance of studies in the field of targeted prevention compared to universal prevention of NSSI? The higher expected effect sizes for prevention in patients compared to universal prevention programs [where effect sizes have been recently shown to range between d = 0.07 and d = 0.40 ( 33 )] may be one factor ( 34 ). Moreover, targeted prevention shows higher feasibility, as it can occur in a controlled, clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, evaluation studies on universal prevention programs are more resource-intensive, requiring higher case numbers and often collaborations outside the clinic, such as with schools. However, from a salutogenetic perspective [Ottowa-Charta ( 35 )], universal approaches are particularly important, as they strive to maintain health rather than reduce symptoms ( 34 , 36 ). Furthermore, interventions at an early stage are considered cost-effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a clustering effect of 4.95 was determined. Assuming a small effect size (Cohens d = 0.2) in universal prevention based on previous studies [71], with a significance level alpha = 0.05 and a power = 0.9, g*power suggests a total of N = 306 [72].…”
Section: Sample Size {14}mentioning
confidence: 99%