1999
DOI: 10.1109/59.761909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unit commitment with transmission security and voltage constraints

Abstract: In this paper, optimal power flow (with transmission security and voltage constraints) is incorporated in the unit commitment formulation. Using Benders decomposition, the formulation is decomposed into a master problem and a subproblem. The master problem solves unit commitment with prevailing constraints, except transmission security and voltage constraints, by augmented Lagrangian relaxation. The subproblem minimizes violations of transmission security and voltage constraints for a commitment schedule given… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The master problem is the traditional unit commitment problem without the transmission and voltage constraints, and the sub-problems include securitychecking routines using the results from the master problem and Benders cuts [20,21]. This method has been used to solve the UC problem with transmission constraints and voltage constraints [22], and with stochastic unit commitment to include higher penetration of wind energy resources [23].…”
Section: Ab32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The master problem is the traditional unit commitment problem without the transmission and voltage constraints, and the sub-problems include securitychecking routines using the results from the master problem and Benders cuts [20,21]. This method has been used to solve the UC problem with transmission constraints and voltage constraints [22], and with stochastic unit commitment to include higher penetration of wind energy resources [23].…”
Section: Ab32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of I = 36 thermal units from an IEEE 118 system (Ma and Shahidehpour (1999)) are used in all experiments and some parameters are adjusted for our models: (i) the fuel cost is linear in stead of quadratic form, and (ii) the ramping up/down parameters are adjusted according to the rule in Frangioni and Gentile (2006). The fixed price before response is 15 and the same L = 10 levels price and demand increase/decrease are pre-defined at each time (the discrete increase/decrease levels are sampled from experiment results in Faruqui and Sergici (2009)).…”
Section: Initialization Assign Feasible Values Of First Stage Decisimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual benefit on the influential UC problem by [21], mainly approaches on MINLP with non-convex representation of thermal unit operator with undefined network constraints [22][23][24][25]; As UC problem have been comprehensive classically to incorporate a DC representation both with or without (e.g., [26][27]) real power losses are considered. Although, with DC power flow constraints relatively than AC problemmightguide to inaccuracy, as a DC model ignore reactive power and voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%