1981
DOI: 10.1107/s0021889881009618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unit-cell refinement from powder diffraction scans

Abstract: A procedure for the refinement of the crystal unit cell from a powder diffraction scan is presented. In this procedure knowledge of the crystal structure is not required, and at the end of the refinement a list of indexed intensities is produced. This list may well be usable as the starting point for the application of direct methods. The problems of least‐squares ill‐conditioning due to overlapping reflections are overcome by constraints. An example, using decafluorocyclohexene, C6F10, shows the quality of fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
1,428
0
22

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,859 publications
(1,466 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
16
1,428
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffraction pattern was indexed using DICVOL91 44 to a monoclinic cell [F(18) = 71.0, M(18) = 19.8] and space group P2 1 /n was assigned from volume considerations and a statistical consideration of the systematic absences. The data set was background subtracted and truncated to d = 2.795 Å (2θ = 17.00°), for Pawley refinement 45 and the structure was solved ab initio using the simulated annealing (SA) global optimization procedure implemented in the DASH computer program 46,47 . The SA structure solution involved the optimization of four independent fragments in the asymmetric unit (one Cu atom, two Cl atom and one pyimH ligand), totalling 16 degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Mmol)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction pattern was indexed using DICVOL91 44 to a monoclinic cell [F(18) = 71.0, M(18) = 19.8] and space group P2 1 /n was assigned from volume considerations and a statistical consideration of the systematic absences. The data set was background subtracted and truncated to d = 2.795 Å (2θ = 17.00°), for Pawley refinement 45 and the structure was solved ab initio using the simulated annealing (SA) global optimization procedure implemented in the DASH computer program 46,47 . The SA structure solution involved the optimization of four independent fragments in the asymmetric unit (one Cu atom, two Cl atom and one pyimH ligand), totalling 16 degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Mmol)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powder diffraction patterns were acquired at 25 °C using a Bruker (Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) General Area Detector Diffraction System (GADDS) equipped with a helium tunnel to reduce air scatter. The program Diffrac plus TOPAS (Bruker AXS GMBH, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used for line shape fitting to the trigonal and orthorhombic unit cell parameters using the Pawley method 32 . Additional experiment details are given in the supporting information.…”
Section: B X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a LeBail or Pawley fit if lattice parameters are of interest, or Rietveld refinement if structural information is also desired. 94,95 Rietveld refinement is the preferred approach to confirm phase purity, as it considers peak intensities as well as locations, which will prove impossible to fit well should there exist multiple phases with overlapped peaks. The Rietveld approach will also naturally provide a quantitative measure of the various phases present in a sample in the case of secondary phases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Powdersmentioning
confidence: 99%