Abstract:We consider g-measures for the shift on 11^=0 $ where S is a finite set. For a certain class of continuous g, two g-measures are identified; they are equal if and only if there is a unique g-measure. We prove that the natural extensions of these measures are Bernoulli. With a further restriction on g when S is a two-point set, we show that there is a unique g-measure. We also consider extensions of these results to the non-continuous case.
“…The proof follows from the properties of attractive functions g ∈ G and associated g-measures described in Hulse (2006Hulse ( , 1991.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Hulse (1991), for x, y ∈ X , a, b ∈ A, and h 1 , h 2 ∈ C(X ), we define the function P : X × X → [0, 1] by P (ax, by) = min {h 1 (ax), h 2 (ay)} if a = b {h 1 (ax) − h 2 (ay)} ∨ 0 otherwise, and a∈A b∈A P (ax, by) = 1. Let f ∈ C(X ).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any functions f 1 , f 2 ∈ C(X ), we have that lim n→∞ L n P (f 1 ⊗ f 2 )(+1, +1) exists and defines a coupling ν between ν + 1 and ν + 2 (Hulse (1991)). By construction and definition of P , this coupling has the property that ν({(x, y) ∈ X × X : x 0 < y 0 }) = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, the problem of non-uniqueness is much less understood and the literature is still based on few examples (Bramson & Kalikow, 1993;Hulse, 2006;Berger et al, 2005). As far as we know, general criteria for non-uniqueness have only been obtained for the class of regular attractive functions (Gallo & Takahashi, 2013;Hulse, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we study the properties of a sequence of suitably chosen Markov chains. Theorem 2 is inspired by the works of Bramson & Kalikow (1993), Lacroix (2000), and Hulse (1991), but has the advantage of being formulated using thed-distance, which is key to our constructive proof of Theorem 1. Moreover, Theorem 3 states that our criterion (Theorem 2) is optimal in the important class of binary regular attractive functions, giving a necessary and sufficient condition for non-uniqueness in this class, which includes the BK model.…”
Abstract. The aim of the present article is to explicitly compute parameters for which the Bramson-Kalikow model exhibits phase-transition. The main ingredient of the proof is a simple new criterion for non-uniqueness of g-measures. We show that the existence of multiple g-measures compatible with a function g can be proved by estimating thed-distances between some suitably chosen Markov chains. The method is optimal for the important class of binary regular attractive functions, which includes the Bramson-Kalikow model.
“…The proof follows from the properties of attractive functions g ∈ G and associated g-measures described in Hulse (2006Hulse ( , 1991.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Hulse (1991), for x, y ∈ X , a, b ∈ A, and h 1 , h 2 ∈ C(X ), we define the function P : X × X → [0, 1] by P (ax, by) = min {h 1 (ax), h 2 (ay)} if a = b {h 1 (ax) − h 2 (ay)} ∨ 0 otherwise, and a∈A b∈A P (ax, by) = 1. Let f ∈ C(X ).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any functions f 1 , f 2 ∈ C(X ), we have that lim n→∞ L n P (f 1 ⊗ f 2 )(+1, +1) exists and defines a coupling ν between ν + 1 and ν + 2 (Hulse (1991)). By construction and definition of P , this coupling has the property that ν({(x, y) ∈ X × X : x 0 < y 0 }) = 0.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding, the problem of non-uniqueness is much less understood and the literature is still based on few examples (Bramson & Kalikow, 1993;Hulse, 2006;Berger et al, 2005). As far as we know, general criteria for non-uniqueness have only been obtained for the class of regular attractive functions (Gallo & Takahashi, 2013;Hulse, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we study the properties of a sequence of suitably chosen Markov chains. Theorem 2 is inspired by the works of Bramson & Kalikow (1993), Lacroix (2000), and Hulse (1991), but has the advantage of being formulated using thed-distance, which is key to our constructive proof of Theorem 1. Moreover, Theorem 3 states that our criterion (Theorem 2) is optimal in the important class of binary regular attractive functions, giving a necessary and sufficient condition for non-uniqueness in this class, which includes the BK model.…”
Abstract. The aim of the present article is to explicitly compute parameters for which the Bramson-Kalikow model exhibits phase-transition. The main ingredient of the proof is a simple new criterion for non-uniqueness of g-measures. We show that the existence of multiple g-measures compatible with a function g can be proved by estimating thed-distances between some suitably chosen Markov chains. The method is optimal for the important class of binary regular attractive functions, which includes the Bramson-Kalikow model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.