2014
DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/27/9/2281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explicit estimates in the Bramson–Kalikow model

Abstract: Abstract. The aim of the present article is to explicitly compute parameters for which the Bramson-Kalikow model exhibits phase-transition. The main ingredient of the proof is a simple new criterion for non-uniqueness of g-measures. We show that the existence of multiple g-measures compatible with a function g can be proved by estimating thed-distances between some suitably chosen Markov chains. The method is optimal for the important class of binary regular attractive functions, which includes the Bramson-Kal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequence of measures µ [m k ] , k ≥ 1 was used by [23] for their proof of phase transition of the Bramson-Kalikow model. Suppose for now that there exists a shift-invariant measure µ compatible with g. We can easily derive a lower bound for d(µ, µ [m k ] ).…”
Section: Explicit Upper Bound For the D-distance And Speed Of Markovi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sequence of measures µ [m k ] , k ≥ 1 was used by [23] for their proof of phase transition of the Bramson-Kalikow model. Suppose for now that there exists a shift-invariant measure µ compatible with g. We can easily derive a lower bound for d(µ, µ [m k ] ).…”
Section: Explicit Upper Bound For the D-distance And Speed Of Markovi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main interests in SCUMs comes from the fact that they exhibit different mixing properties depending on the characteristics of the probability kernels. For instance, kernels with strong dependence on the past can have two or more shift invariant measures compatible with the kernel [4,33,23,22,14,1]. Weak dependence on the past leads to uniqueness of the compatible measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%