Unions and Productivity: Convergence or Divergence in Perceptions?

Grant, Michel; Harvey, Jean

doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-1904-3_78

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only one study in Canada examines the union effect on productivity. Using a small sample of 100 firms, Grant and Harvey (1992) find no significant difference between management's perception of workplace productivity in unionized and non-unionized firms.…”

Section: Unions and (Other) Key Firm Outcomes: An Empirical Reviewmentioning

confidence: 80%

What Do Unions Do to Innovation? An Empirical Examination of the Canadian Private Sector

Walsworth¹

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article uses Canadian national data to examine the union effect on product innovation, a firm outcome which is widely researched in the management literature but has been less prominent in Industrial Relations scholarship. Using a longitudinal sample from the employer survey of the Canadian Workplace and Employee Survey, the union effect on a firm’s ability to create or improve a product is examined. According to the commonly held view that unions impede firm performance, the results should point to a negative relationship between unions and product innovation. Interestingly, a strong negative effect is not observed. In fact a small statistically significant positive union effect is reported. This result is considered to be robust. Across various specifications the presence of a union and the intensity of the presence (firm union density) have significant and positive effects on a firm’s ability to innovate new products over a seven year period (1999-2005).The results of this study do not imply that the presence of a union is an important determinant of product innovation. The results are noteworthy because they do not identify a negative relationship between unions and a measure of firm performance: product innovation. In this regard, the results give weight to the observation that there is very little empirical support for the popular argument that unions impede firm performance.In Canada the demise of organized labour is often justified as a necessary adjustment to increasingly competitive markets. Indeed the signing of the 1993 NAFTA has put unions under greater scrutiny for their impact on Canada’s ability to compete internationally. That unions make firms less competitive is commonly accepted as a reasonable assessment. The results of this study and a review of the empirical literature on the union effect on other key firm outcomes such as productivity, labour costs, employment growth, sales and profitability, suggest that the popularly held negative assessment of unions is not based on a conclusive body of literature.Cet article utilise des données nationales canadiennes pour examiner l’effet des syndicats en matière d’innovation en matière de produits dans les entreprises, sujet abondamment traité dans la littérature managériale mais moins présent dans les travaux empiriques en relations industrielles. À partir d’un échantillon longitudinal de la composante « employeur » de l’Enquête sur le milieu de travail et les employés (EMTE) de Statistique Canada, l’effet de la présence syndicale sur la capacité de l’entreprise à créer de nouveaux produits ou à améliorer ses produits déjà existants est étudié. Selon un point de vue communément admis à l’effet que les syndicats agiraient plutôt comme un frein sur la performance de l’entreprise, les résultats de l’étude devraient indiquer une relation négative entre la présence syndicale et l’innovation en matière de produit. Or l’étude ne révèle aucun lien négatif fort. Au mieux seul un faible lien positif est observable d’un point de vue statistique. Et ce résu...

show abstract

Section: Unions and (Other) Key Firm Outcomes: An Empirical Reviewmentioning

confidence: 80%

What Do Unions Do to Innovation? An Empirical Examination of the Canadian Private Sector

Walsworth¹

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Only one study in Canada examines the union effect on productivity. Using a small sample of 100 firms, Grant and Harvey (1992) find no significant difference between the perception of workplace productivity in unionized and non‐unionized establishments.…”

Section: Unions and Employment: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 81%

Unions and Employment Growth: The Canadian Experience

Walsworth¹

2009

Industrial Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using panel data from the Canadian Workplace and Employee Survey, the union effect on employment growth is examined. In line with previous North American findings, private sector unions are found to slow employment growth by approximately 2.2 percent per annum. This study is modeled after two recent articles published in this journal; one using the Australian Workplace and Industrial Relations Survey and a subsequent article using the British Workplace and Industrial/Employee Relations Survey.

show abstract

Unions and Productivity: Convergence or Divergence in Perceptions?

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

What Do Unions Do to Innovation? An Empirical Examination of the Canadian Private Sector

What Do Unions Do to Innovation? An Empirical Examination of the Canadian Private Sector

Unions and Employment Growth: The Canadian Experience

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About