2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.2009.00591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unions and Employment Growth: The Canadian Experience

Abstract: Using panel data from the Canadian Workplace and Employee Survey, the union effect on employment growth is examined. In line with previous North American findings, private sector unions are found to slow employment growth by approximately 2.2 percent per annum. This study is modeled after two recent articles published in this journal; one using the Australian Workplace and Industrial Relations Survey and a subsequent article using the British Workplace and Industrial/Employee Relations Survey.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…www.erudit.org Tous droits réservés © Département des relations industrielles de l 'Université Laval, 2012 from 2.2% per annum to zero in his sample, depending on the measures of unionization and employment growth that he used. However, even taking the high-end estimate, Walsworth's (2010a) results seem to point to a diminution of the union employment growth suppression effect in Canada, given Long's (1993) finding of a union employment growth penalty of 3.7% to 3.9% per annum during 1980-85.…”
Section: Résumé De L'articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…www.erudit.org Tous droits réservés © Département des relations industrielles de l 'Université Laval, 2012 from 2.2% per annum to zero in his sample, depending on the measures of unionization and employment growth that he used. However, even taking the high-end estimate, Walsworth's (2010a) results seem to point to a diminution of the union employment growth suppression effect in Canada, given Long's (1993) finding of a union employment growth penalty of 3.7% to 3.9% per annum during 1980-85.…”
Section: Résumé De L'articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous notons toutefois que l'analyse de Walsworth (2010a) n'est pas comparable à celle menée par Long (1993) à plusieurs égards. Par exemple, Walsworth (2010a) ne ventile pas son analyse selon la taille des établissements, ni selon le secteur industriel. De plus, il n'a pas cherché à expliquer les raisons du ralentissement possible de l'effet de baisse de l'emploi syndiqué, une lacune que nous cherchons à combler en examinant deux facteurs potentiellement associés à un tel ralentissement, soit la croissance des gains d'emploi et l'avantage salarial des travailleurs syndiqués.Pour ce faire, nous avons analysé les données de l'EMTE couvrant la période et, comme Long (1993, nous avons observé d'importantes différences lorsque nous avons ventilé nos données pour fins d'analyse selon la taille des établissements, l'effet de la baisse de l'emploi syndiqué apparaissant dans les grands établissements manufacturiers mais pas dans les plus petits.…”
Section: Résumé De L'articleunclassified
“…However the evidence against unions is not without exceptions and, especially in the Canadian context, it is either absent or dated. For instance, the only relevant Canadian empirical study to be published in the last fourteen years finds a much diminished negative union impact (Walsworth, 2010). From an empirical standpoint, the effect of Canadian unions on firm performance is poorly documented in the Industrial Relations literature.…”
Section: Unions and (Other) Key Firm Outcomes: An Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Canada, Long (1993) analyzed a sample of 510 Canadian workplaces from the period of 1980 to 1985, and reported that union firms grew 3.7 percent more slowly per year within the manufacturing industries and 3.9 percent more slowly per year within the nonmanufacturing industry. Also using Canadian data, Walsworth (2010) finds evidence of a diminished union employment effect in a sample covering 1999 to 2005. In fact Walsworth does not find any relationship between unions and employment growth when he employs the commonly used 'union status' measure, whereby even the presence of a single union member triggers the firm to be coded as 'unionized'.…”
Section: Unions and (Other) Key Firm Outcomes: An Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation