2016
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201601-082oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral Pleural Effusions with More Than One Apparent Etiology. A Prospective Observational Study

Abstract: This study is the first to estimate the prevalence of more than one identifiable cause for a unilateral pleural effusion. Out of 130 study subjects, 38 (30%) had multiple causes for an effusion. The identification of multiple pathologies underlying an accumulation of fluid in the pleural space may be important in determining optimum treatment and improving patients' symptoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in accordance with three of the five above studies (18,19,21). The sensitivity was higher in two studies (86% and 92%, respectively) (11,20).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are in accordance with three of the five above studies (18,19,21). The sensitivity was higher in two studies (86% and 92%, respectively) (11,20).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Furthermore, the sensitivity of a non-guideline supported CT was significantly higher than a guideline-supported CT. The sensitivity of CT for predicting malignancy in pleural effusions have been investigated in five studies, yet none reported data on unilateral effusions in isolation (11,(18)(19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may indicate that being evaluated for possible malignancy-associated pleural effusion by VATS, i.e., having recurrent pleural effusion is a marker of significant and serious yet non-malignant condition. It is well-known that pleural effusions may in many cases have more than one cause (17). However, there are no long-term prospective studies on possible benefits or risks of follow-up in these patients, yet systematic evaluation for thyroid, renal, hepatic and heart disease increased the number of targetable diagnoses (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Idiopathic pleural effusion was defined as any persistent, exudative pleural effusion that remains undiagnosed after the history and physical examination, biochemical and cytological studies of pleural fluid, radiographic examinations and histopathological analysis of biopsied specimens [4,6]. Diagnosis of idiopathic pleural effusion was made after a minimum of 1-year follow-up (range 5 1-10 years), with detailed exploration including computed tomographic (CT) scanning to exclude other causes of effusion such as malignant pleural mesothelioma and carcinomatous pleuritis, according to previous studies that mainly performed follow-up of 1-2 years [4,7,[33][34][35][36]. In this retrospective study, we accumulated 830 pleural fluid samples at Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center between 2000 and 2012 and reviewed 35 patients with undiagnosed pleural effusions who underwent thoracoscopy and pleural biopsy, after excluding three patients who had a malignancy during follow-up.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%