2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unified modeling of setting and strength development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energy values determined as per ASTM C1074 (2004) from mortar cube testing performed in Phase II-Task 2 of this project as listed in Table 5.5 were used. The strength activation energy values for all mixture are greater than those obtained from isothermal calorimetry, which is in agreement with the findings ofPinto and Schindler (2010).…”
Section: Early-age Compressive Strength Developmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activation energy values determined as per ASTM C1074 (2004) from mortar cube testing performed in Phase II-Task 2 of this project as listed in Table 5.5 were used. The strength activation energy values for all mixture are greater than those obtained from isothermal calorimetry, which is in agreement with the findings ofPinto and Schindler (2010).…”
Section: Early-age Compressive Strength Developmentsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although the initial and final set times at each curing temperature varied significantly, the calculated equivalent ages did not, as shown in Figure 1.6. This was also confirmed by Wade et al (2010), Weakley (2010), and Pinto and Schindler (2010). The setting times may be estimated for a given mixture at varying placement conditions if the apparent activation energy, temperature history, and equivalent ages at setting are known.…”
Section: Ultimate Degree Of Hydrationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, the value of S u under variable temperature was not clearly identified, which would lead to additional hard task to obtain straightforwardly the strength development at a specified age. Pinto and Schindler (2010) proposed an extended maturity approach to unify the distinctly different temperature sensitivities before setting and during the hardening period of concrete, based on the Arrhenius maturity function. The effect of different activation energies on the strength-maturity relationship was taken into account, as summarized in Table 6.…”
Section: Review Of Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the use of high-strength concrete (HSC) has been gradually encouraged for the fast-track construction of nuclear facility structures, especially in South Korea. The strength development of HSC is more sensitive to the curing temperature than normal-strength concrete (NSC) because the hydration rate of cement is greater at a lower water-cementitious materials ratio and a higher curing temperature (Kim et al 2002a;Pinto and Schindler 2010). As a result, the strengthmaturity models established from the NSC test data using standard cylinders are frequently pointed out to overestimate the in situ strength of HSC, particularly under a cold temperature at an early age (Parsons and Naik 1985;Hulshizer 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation