Unhealthy Neighbourhood “Syndrome”: A Useful Label for Analysing and Providing Advice on Urban Design Decision-Making?

Abstract

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, there was growing interest in designing healthier neighbourhoods. Adopting this perspective brings attention to how conditions in neighbourhoods (directly and indirectly) affect their inhabitants’ physical health and mental wellbeing. However, considerably less attention has been paid to how to alleviate such conditions through integrated interventions designed to operate specifically at the neighbourhood scale. To address this gap, this paper introduces the term “unhealthy neighbourhood syndrome” (UNS). The conceptual clarity and practical utility offered by using this term are critically examined. The paper contains a rigorous review and critical analysis of academic and grey literature on what are held to be the relationships between key features of the built environment and people’s health and wellbeing. It also examines literature offering advice on how urban designers should make neighbourhoods healthier. It illustrates the complexity of the range of issues involved and the complicated web of top down, bottom up and middling out actors that need to be involved in making decisions about them. Despite having inherent weaknesses, the term “unhealthy neighbourhood syndrome” is judged to be useful. It illustrates how seemingly separate issues operate in urban design, promoted for tackling specific symptoms of ill health, need to be addressed jointly through an integrated programme of parallel work streams operating at the neighbourhood scale. The paper is innovative in identifying the wide cluster of symptoms used to describe unhealthy neighbourhoods in the literature as being a “syndrome”. Its significance lies in its injunction that this syndrome needs to be tackled through integrated streams of remedial action drawing on experience and expertise that lie beyond those offered by the traditional membership of urban design teams.

Assessing the quality of urban life in three neighbourhoods, Lilongwe, Malawi

“…Consequently, this study echoes the belief of many modern scholars who state that the urban theory must engage with the distinctive interpretations drawn from the diverse physical, social, economic and welfare realities of cities in the South (Jenkins, 2013;Anderson, et al, 2015;Murray and Myers, 2006). The study resonates with the emerging body of knowledge which engages with various environmental aspects and social indicators of sustainable neighbourhoods and the associated placemaking strategies (Adewumi et al, 2019;AlWaer et al, 2021;Martins et al, 2021).…”

Unpacking the concept of 20-minute neighbourhoods: disentangling “desired outcomes” from the “means” available for achieving them

“…A further difficulty is the term 'neighbourhood' itself (AlWaer et al, 2021) et al, 2021), identifying a neighbourhood either through: 1) administrative geography or 2) subjective identification. These differences can be traced to the backgrounds of disciplines that employ them.…”

Homeostasis versus growth: A view of their roles in adaptation to adversity, trauma, chronic illness, and physical disability. Part II: Integrative views, unifying postulates, and a preliminary model.

“…A more realistic, wide-angle view of the adaptation process appears to favor the use of dynamically informed concentric models. Indeed, concentric models have gained popularity in a wide range of ecological, medical, social, and psychological domains, including ecology and human behavior (Bronfenbrenner, 1977), environmental planning (AlWaer et al, 2021), health maintenance and promotion (Dahlgren & Whitehead, 2021; Hoffman & Driscoll, 2000; Richard et al, 2011), nursing (Newman & Fawcett, 2002), and disability studies (Fisher et al, 2005; Smedema, 2017). Aldwin et al’s (1996) illustration of Maruyama's (1963) model also depicts deviation-amplifying adaptive and nonadaptive processes as following a circular trajectory.…”