Unequal socioeconomic distribution of the primary care workforce: whole-population small area longitudinal study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo measure changes in socioeconomic inequality in the distribution of family physicians (general practitioners (GPs)) relative to need in England from 2004/2005 to 2013/2014.DesignWhole-population small area longitudinal data linkage study.SettingEngland from 2004/2005 to 2013/2014.Participants32 482 lower layer super output areas (neighbourhoods of 1500 people on average).Main outcome measuresSlope index of inequality (SII) between the most and least deprived small areas in annual full-time equivalent GPs (FTE GPs) per 100 000 need adjusted population.ResultsIn 2004/2005, inequality in primary care supply as measured by the SII in FTE GPs was 4.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.3) GPs per 100 000. By 2013/2014, this SII had fallen to −0.7 (95% CI −2.5 to 1.1) GPs per 100 000. The number of FTE GPs per 100 000 serving the most deprived fifth of small areas increased over this period from 54.0 to 60.5, while increasing from 57.2 to 59.9 in the least deprived fifth, so that by the end of the study period there were more GPs per 100 000 need adjusted population in the most deprived areas than in the least deprived. The increase in GP supply in the most deprived fifth of neighbourhoods was larger in areas that received targeted investment for establishing new practices under the ‘Equitable Access to Primary Medical Care’.ConclusionsThere was a substantial reduction in socioeconomic inequality in family physician supply associated with national policy. This policy may not have completely eliminated socioeconomic inequality in family physician supply since existing need adjustment formulae do not fully capture the additional burden of multimorbidity in deprived neighbourhoods. The small area approach introduced in this study can be used routinely to monitor socioeconomic inequality of access to primary care and to indicate workforce shortages in particular neighbourhoods. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Spatial Accessibility of Primary Care in England: A Cross‐Sectional Study Using a Floating Catchment Area Method

“…; Asaria et al. ). Focusing on the populations health status, a link between disability and accessibility was recently shown in a study where adults with physical disabilities were more likely to have an unmet need to see a doctor due to difficulties getting to the practice and entering the building (Popplewell, Rechel, and Abel ).…”

Population health needs as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a cross-sectional study of English general practices in 2013–2014 and 2014–2015

“…In 2004–2014, the gap in GP numbers per patient narrowed between areas with high and low deprivation, using lower-layer super output areas (LSOA) as the population unit;33 the present study was cross-sectional and used practices, a larger population unit not always configured geographically.…”

Outcomes and inequalities in diabetes from 2004/2005 to 2011/2012: English longitudinal study

“…10,11 • targeted support was developed for effective primary care interventions for chronic conditions, including diabetes, in disadvantaged adults from 2007 until 2009. 12 In 2012, the Health and Social Care Act gave the NHS an explicit duty to consider reducing inequalities in healthcare outcomes.…”