1997
DOI: 10.3406/rfsp.1997.395148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Une citoyenneté différée : sens civique et assimilation des indigènes dans les Établissements français de l'Inde

Abstract: En 1871, les Indiens des Établissements français de l'Inde sont dotés du droit de vote aux élections nationales bien qu'ils soient soumis à un statut civil différent de l'état civil français. Pour ramener leur situation dans le droit commun, le législateur réactive d'abord le mécanisme de la renonciation, démarche libre et soumise à aucun agrément administratif, qui permet à ceux des Indiens qui le désirent d'abandonner leur statut personnel pour adopter l'état civil français. Mais en faisant des renonçants de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past two decades, citizenship studies have significantly complexified social–scientific notions of civic membership and inequality in several ways. First, by bringing to light the “infrajuridical cleavages traversing the category of the citizen” (Spire ) and by showing that the distinction between citizen and noncitizen is not a dichotomous one, but rests on a continuous and reversible gradation often connected with ethnoracial and ethnonational hierarchies (Brubaker ; Deschamp ; Stasiulis and Bakan ; Gozdziak ; Morris ; Ngai ; Castles ; Noiriel ; Wacquant ; Sassen ; Nyers ). Second, by uncovering different dimensions of citizenship, whether they pertain to the categories of rights granted as a consequence of membership (Marshall ; Turner ) or to the various channels through which membership can be performed and actualized: citizenship as rights, legal status, identity, or participation (see Bloemraad ; Bosniak ; Bauböck ; Bloemraad, Korteweg and Yurdakul ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, citizenship studies have significantly complexified social–scientific notions of civic membership and inequality in several ways. First, by bringing to light the “infrajuridical cleavages traversing the category of the citizen” (Spire ) and by showing that the distinction between citizen and noncitizen is not a dichotomous one, but rests on a continuous and reversible gradation often connected with ethnoracial and ethnonational hierarchies (Brubaker ; Deschamp ; Stasiulis and Bakan ; Gozdziak ; Morris ; Ngai ; Castles ; Noiriel ; Wacquant ; Sassen ; Nyers ). Second, by uncovering different dimensions of citizenship, whether they pertain to the categories of rights granted as a consequence of membership (Marshall ; Turner ) or to the various channels through which membership can be performed and actualized: citizenship as rights, legal status, identity, or participation (see Bloemraad ; Bosniak ; Bauböck ; Bloemraad, Korteweg and Yurdakul ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. From the 1600s, France established its own East India Company and coastal trading posts and, from the 1700s onwards, offered support for various Indian dissident leaders struggling against British rule (Weber, 1996, Marsh, 2009). In 1963, several years after India’s 1947 Independence, France ceded Pondicherry and parts of Karaikal, Maha and Yanam, known as “French-influenced territories” (Deschamps, 1997). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%