2013
DOI: 10.4276/030802213x13706169933021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Twitter

Abstract: This opinion piece introduces, defines and considers the application of Twitter within occupational therapy research and education. It defines the social networking tool and then examines its potential for use in occupational therapy education, by students and within research. The opinion piece raises critical issues that the profession must address in relation to the responsible use of Twitter but strongly advocates it as a form of social media that needs to be better understood and utilised by educators, res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…So it was not surprising to find doctors exhorting other doctors to join Twitter [ 3 ]. While voicing concerns with maintaining privacy and professionalism on social media, proponents described largely idyllic scenarios emphasizing Twitter’s potential for aiding career development [ 4 ], connecting with colleagues, building relationships with patients [ 5 ], enabling virtual journal clubs and scientific conferences [ 6 ], complementing traditional teaching methods [ 7 , 8 ], critically appraising and reviewing research [ 9 ], or all of the above [ 6 ]. Some have argued that Twitter promised to speed knowledge transfer and bridge the communication gap between researchers and stakeholders [ 10 ] leading others to suggest strategies and tips to improve the dissemination of research findings [ 11 ], and to engage readers to follow journals’ Twitter accounts [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So it was not surprising to find doctors exhorting other doctors to join Twitter [ 3 ]. While voicing concerns with maintaining privacy and professionalism on social media, proponents described largely idyllic scenarios emphasizing Twitter’s potential for aiding career development [ 4 ], connecting with colleagues, building relationships with patients [ 5 ], enabling virtual journal clubs and scientific conferences [ 6 ], complementing traditional teaching methods [ 7 , 8 ], critically appraising and reviewing research [ 9 ], or all of the above [ 6 ]. Some have argued that Twitter promised to speed knowledge transfer and bridge the communication gap between researchers and stakeholders [ 10 ] leading others to suggest strategies and tips to improve the dissemination of research findings [ 11 ], and to engage readers to follow journals’ Twitter accounts [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pesan public yang dikirim dan diterima melalui twitter atau dikenal dengan 'tweet' dibatasi tidak lebih dari 140 karakter serta dapat menyertakan tautan ke blog, halaman web, gambar, video serta media lainnya. Sebagai alat komunikasi, Twitter memungkinkan pertukaran ide secara bebas secara nasional dan global, antara orang-orang yang tertarik pada bidang keahlian yang serupa, serta memberikan kesempatan untuk terlibat dalam debat kritis [9].…”
Section: Penelitian Terkaitunclassified
“…Sebelumnya budaya seperti ini juga muncul melalui media sosial Twitter di pertengahan tahun 2000, di mana khalayak secara bebas dapat membentuk jaringan dengan berbagi informasi terkini (Mistry, 2011). Walaupun dibatasi oleh jumlah karakter tertentu, tidak menutup kreativitas para penggunanya mengingat Twitter juga dapat diberi tautan ke situs lain, diberi unggahan foto hingga video (Maclean, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified