2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-017-1224-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Role of Mass-Unloading in a Filament Eruption

Abstract: We describe a partial filament eruption on 11 December 2011 that demonstrates that the inclusion of mass is an important next step for understanding solar eruptions. Observations from the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory-Behind (STEREO-B) and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) spacecraft were used to remove line-of-sight projection effects in filament motion and correlate the effect of plasma dynamics with the evolution of the filament height. Flux cancellation and nearby flux emergence are shown to h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in height observed by Jenkins et al (2018) after the prominence underwent mass-draining was > 60 Mm before leaving the field-of-view. The simple model described here predicts the maximum possible increase in height for the same amount of mass-draining to be up to 1.7 Mm, assuming the final state is also in equilibrium.…”
Section: Implications For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in height observed by Jenkins et al (2018) after the prominence underwent mass-draining was > 60 Mm before leaving the field-of-view. The simple model described here predicts the maximum possible increase in height for the same amount of mass-draining to be up to 1.7 Mm, assuming the final state is also in equilibrium.…”
Section: Implications For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, the large increase in the height of the observed prominence (60 Mm) shortly after the draining of mass could be interpreted as being caused by the flux rope losing equilibrium and erupting into the heliosphere due to the torus instability. The prominence observed by Jenkins et al (2018) did successfully erupt and was later observed as a CME by multiple coronagraphs.…”
Section: Implications For Observationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the local plasma density and thus gravitational pull are reduced, the filament field would inflate, simultaneously pushing the overlying arcade outward, which is the opposite of an implosion. Similarly, during the eruption in Figure 9(d), such a process would occur if mass along the filament field could drain down (see relevant studies, e.g., Fong et al 2002;Bi et al 2014;Fan 2017;Jenkins et al 2018, pointing out that substantial filament material drains down that may influence the dynamics) and also spread into a larger volume. Moreover, as the filament field becomes more vertical, the draining could increase, further inflating the surrounding field.…”
Section: Unsuccessful Implosionmentioning
confidence: 90%