2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-019-1423-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eruptive Instability of the Magnetic-Flux Rope: Gravitational Force and Mass-Unloading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most reasonable force that can terminate ascending of the flux rope and balance the Lorenz force seems gravity. The gravity force can be negligible at a low height compared with any component of the Lorenz force and not influence on initial equilibrium and stability of the flux rope, although under certain condition it can increase the value of n c (Tsap et al 2019). The situation is quite different at greater heights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most reasonable force that can terminate ascending of the flux rope and balance the Lorenz force seems gravity. The gravity force can be negligible at a low height compared with any component of the Lorenz force and not influence on initial equilibrium and stability of the flux rope, although under certain condition it can increase the value of n c (Tsap et al 2019). The situation is quite different at greater heights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous numerical studies mainly focus on flux rope catastrophes associated with the magnetic parameters of the rope; whether the variation of the mass could cause flux rope catastrophes, however, has hardly been touched upon previously. In fact, as concluded by Low (1996), the total mass of a flux rope should play an important role in stabilizing the rope, which is further confirmed by some recent studies (Hillier & van Ballegooijen 2013;Jenkins et al 2019;Tsap et al 2019;Fan 2020). Moreover, the total mass of a flux rope is usually not conserved but highly dynamic Gibson 2018): it either accumulates via, e.g., coronal condensation (Liu et al 2012;Xia & Keppens 2016;Jenkins & Keppens 2021), or decreases as a result of, e.g., mass unloading (Low 1996) and mass drainage processes (Bi et al 2014;Jenkins et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Later there were found magnetic configurations that can provide equilibrium of coronal structures without taking into account their weight, and that this equilibrium can be suddenly lost leading to eruption (van Tend & Kuperus, 1978;Molodenskii & Filippov, 1987;Priest & Forbes, 1990;Forbes & Isenberg, 1991;Lin et al, 1998;Schmieder et al, 2013). On the other hand, resent researches showed that mass may be able to influence the local and global properties of coronal magnetic configuration (Low et al, 2003;Petrie et al, 2007;Seaton et al, 2011;Gunár et al, 2013;Bi et al, 2014;Reva et al, 2017;Jenkins et al, 2018;Tsap et al, 2019). Therefore, estimation of prominence mass and its role in equilibrium and initiation of an eruption is significant for theory, modeling, and prediction of eruptive events on the Sun.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%