2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the role of dynamic texture perception in consumers’ expectations of satiety and satiation. A case study on barley bread

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inducing the feeling of satiety related to the consumption of food is based on complex interactions of various parameters characterizing food, such as its energy potential (amount of calories), weight, volume, sensory properties, meal temperature and the so-called "food topography", which is determined by the size of bites, frequency of biting and swallowing rate (de Graaf 2012). Nguyen et al (2017) confirmed the results of previous research, proving a favourable effect of food volume on evoking the feeling of satiety. They found that this is a feature definitely more important than energy value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Inducing the feeling of satiety related to the consumption of food is based on complex interactions of various parameters characterizing food, such as its energy potential (amount of calories), weight, volume, sensory properties, meal temperature and the so-called "food topography", which is determined by the size of bites, frequency of biting and swallowing rate (de Graaf 2012). Nguyen et al (2017) confirmed the results of previous research, proving a favourable effect of food volume on evoking the feeling of satiety. They found that this is a feature definitely more important than energy value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Without loss of generality, the evaluation duration in temporal data was split into smaller time intervals (T0-T40: beginning; T41-T80: middle; T81-T100: end) as presented in several researches (Dinnella, Masi, Naes, & Monteleone, 2013;Nguyen, Wahlgren, Almli, & Varela, 2017). For each time interval, only values above the significant level were used and the scores were the average of the scores given to an attribute during an evaluation weighted by their duration (Labbe et al, 2009).…”
Section: Aggregated Data In Time Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, a list of set terms is provided to participants of the study, and then they are asked to identify or "check" the attributes they perceive are relevant to the given sample (Sinopoli & Lawless, 2012). This method uses little time and resources,and it is easy for participants to understand (Dos Santos et al,2015).Previously,CATA has been found to effectively perform sensory evaluations of bread and GFBs (Aguiar, Rodrigues, Queiroz, Melo, & Pineli, 2020;Antúnez, Giménez, & Ares, 2016;Dovi, Chiremba, Taylor, & De Kock, 2018;Nguyen, Wahlgren, Almli, & Varela, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses little time and resources, and it is easy for participants to understand (Dos Santos et al., 2015). Previously, CATA has been found to effectively perform sensory evaluations of bread and GFBs (Aguiar, Rodrigues, Queiroz, Melo, & Pineli, 2020; Antúnez, Giménez, & Ares, 2016; Dovi, Chiremba, Taylor, & De Kock, 2018; Nguyen, Wahlgren, Almli, & Varela, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%