2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-020-2274-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Performance and Applicability of Low Impact Development Structures under Varying Infiltration Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bioretention tank, as a rainwater treatment facility in urban rainwater low impact development technology (LID), can not only store rainwater through the adsorption capacity of internal structure and soil matrix materials, but also effectively attenuate the flood peak flow and runoff of rainwater, and improve rainwater quality through precipitation, filtration, microbial processes and vegetation absorption (Wong & Somes 1995;Liu & Davis 2014;Jiang et al 2018;Ashoori et al 2019). The conventional bioretention tanks can effectively remove total suspended solids (TSS), heavy metals/metals, pathogens and oils from rainwater (Wilcock et al 2012;Halaburka et al 2017;Osman et al 2019;Guerra & Kim 2020). More studies have shown that traditional biological retention tanks can remove 29% ∼ 99% TSS and 98% oil pollution, and can also effectively remove oil pollution with an annual average removal rate of heavy metals such as zinc, copper and lead reaching 98%,99 and 81%, respectively (Feng et al 2001;Li & Davis 2009;Li & Davis 2014;Wang et al 2015;Li et al 2016;Soleimanifar et al 2016;Zhang et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bioretention tank, as a rainwater treatment facility in urban rainwater low impact development technology (LID), can not only store rainwater through the adsorption capacity of internal structure and soil matrix materials, but also effectively attenuate the flood peak flow and runoff of rainwater, and improve rainwater quality through precipitation, filtration, microbial processes and vegetation absorption (Wong & Somes 1995;Liu & Davis 2014;Jiang et al 2018;Ashoori et al 2019). The conventional bioretention tanks can effectively remove total suspended solids (TSS), heavy metals/metals, pathogens and oils from rainwater (Wilcock et al 2012;Halaburka et al 2017;Osman et al 2019;Guerra & Kim 2020). More studies have shown that traditional biological retention tanks can remove 29% ∼ 99% TSS and 98% oil pollution, and can also effectively remove oil pollution with an annual average removal rate of heavy metals such as zinc, copper and lead reaching 98%,99 and 81%, respectively (Feng et al 2001;Li & Davis 2009;Li & Davis 2014;Wang et al 2015;Li et al 2016;Soleimanifar et al 2016;Zhang et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field-based studies categorize LID systems into infiltration-and storage-type facilities and have evaluated the water cycle effect and the ability of these systems to reduce nonpoint sources [20][21][22]. Moreover, previous studies have established the flood control capability and nonpoint source reduction effect by element facilities such as permeable pavements [23,24], green roofs [25], vegetation-type facilities [26], and fine-media stormwater filtration systems [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of green infrastructure, Yan et al studied the hydrology and pollutant removal performance of the LID (low impact development)/GI (green infrastructure) system in the arid and semi-arid areas in the United States (Jiang et al 2015). Heidi et al studied the soil permeability, compared the effects of high permeation soil and low permeation soil on the permeation rate and effective water-storage depth (Guerra & Kim 2020). Wei et al took Alar, Xinjiang as an example,combined with the actual situation of the region, the idea of GI network construction will be put forward in oasis cities in arid regions (Wei et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%