2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt04157f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the magnetic anisotropy for linear sandwich [Er(COT)]+-based compounds: a theoretical investigation

Abstract: A series of linear sandwich single-ion magnets containing [Er(COT)]+ fragment were selected to probe the magneto-structural correlations using ab initio methods. For prolate shaped ErIII ion, an equatorially coordinating geometry...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(63 reference statements)
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are larger than the experimental ones (184.35 cm –1 for R -1-Dy and 42.64 cm –1 for R -2-Dy ), which can be ascribed to the unfavorable effects, such as anharmonic phonons, Raman magnetic relaxation, QTM, etc. on the energy barrier, thus usually resulting in a smaller experimental U eff value than the calculated one. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These values are larger than the experimental ones (184.35 cm –1 for R -1-Dy and 42.64 cm –1 for R -2-Dy ), which can be ascribed to the unfavorable effects, such as anharmonic phonons, Raman magnetic relaxation, QTM, etc. on the energy barrier, thus usually resulting in a smaller experimental U eff value than the calculated one. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For 1 , the experimental effective energy barrier U eff is smaller than the calculated energy gap between the lowest two KDs for each of the individual Dy III fragment due to the unfavourable effects of anharmonic phonons, Raman magnetic relaxation and QTM. 70–73 For 2 , however, the ground transversal magnetic moment of 2_Dy2 as shown in Fig. 5 is large enough to induce a fast QTM at low temperature, which might be the main reason for the poor SMM behavior of 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S23 (ESI †) were calculated to be 328.6, 369.3, 346.9 and 334.2 cm À1 , respectively, obviously higher than their corresponding experimental values, perhaps due to the presence of anharmonic phonons and/or molecular vibration-induced underbarrier relaxations. [33][34][35][36] The largest energy gap being between the lowest two KDs in 1-Dy2 was attributed to its having the largest B(2,0) weight.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%