2008
DOI: 10.1038/nature07152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the limits to generalizability of experimental evolutionary models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the frequent occurrence of local adaptation indicates that there may be multiple routes to generalism (Buckling and Rainey 2002b;Morgan et al 2005;Vos et al 2009;Koskella et al 2011). These data indicate that the GFG framework may only be capturing part of the genetic interactions between bacteria and phages, which has led others to propose more complex specificities (Agrawal andLively 2002, 2003;Weitz et al 2005;Forde et al 2008;Fenton et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the frequent occurrence of local adaptation indicates that there may be multiple routes to generalism (Buckling and Rainey 2002b;Morgan et al 2005;Vos et al 2009;Koskella et al 2011). These data indicate that the GFG framework may only be capturing part of the genetic interactions between bacteria and phages, which has led others to propose more complex specificities (Agrawal andLively 2002, 2003;Weitz et al 2005;Forde et al 2008;Fenton et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the GFG framework, parasites must match or exceed the host's resistance alleles at each locus to have a high probability of causing an infection, which naturally leads to the evolution of generalism in the form of broader resistance and infectivity ranges. These dynamics have been observed in a variety of real host-parasite relationships, including bacterium-phage (Bohannan and Lenski 2000;Buckling and Rainey 2002a;Mizoguchi et al 2003;Brockhurst et al 2006;Forde et al 2008;, plant-pathogen (Flor 1956;Thompson and Burdon 1992;Thrall and Burdon 2003) and nematode-bacterium systems (Schulte et al 2010). Recent studies of bacterium-phage coevolution have found that infectivity range is correlated with the number of amino acid changes in tail fibers relative to the ancestral genotype , providing further support for the GFG framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If phage-bacterial molecular interactions are dominated by single traits and variation in these traits is constrained along a single hierarchical dimension such as LPS, then one should expect the nested pattern to arise. There are other examples of traits with physical characteristics that behave similarly: bacteria that evolve a thicker and thicker protective coating (74), phages that evolve increased host range by continually reducing tail length (73), bacteria that reduce their number of receptors, and phages that target fewer receptors (75). Although there are many examples of this type of one-dimensional interaction, the problem with this finding being a universal explanation for the form of bacterial-phage interactions are that host-phage interactions are governed by hundreds of other genes (76), bacteria can use multiple strategies for resistance (74), and phages have complex mechanism to evade bacteria defenses (74,77).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phages infect bacteria by using specialized proteins that target and bind to molecules on the outer membranes of bacteria (receptor molecules). Nested infection matrices have been shown for T-phages, which infect strains of E. coli, to be the result of the interactions of the phage proteins and receptor molecules (73). T-phages bind to the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) chains on the cell surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%