2019
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12818-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the engines and progenitors of gamma-ray bursts

Abstract: Our understanding of the engines and progenitors of gamma-ray bursts has expanded through the ages as a broader set of diagnostics has allowed us to test our understanding of these objects. Here we review the history of the growth in our understanding, focusing on 3 leading engines and 9 potential progenitors. The first gravitational wave detection of a short burst is the latest in a series of breakthrough observations shaping this understanding and we study the importance of multi-diagnostic, multi-messenger … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the requirement for a stripped envelope progenitor with a large reserve of angular momentum at corecollapse is understood, the exact nature of the progenitors and the evolutionary pathways which lead to long-duration (core-collapse) GRBs are not well constrained (see Levan et al 2016;Fryer et al 2019, and others for reviews). Models invoking single stars struggle to maintain enough angular momentum over the stellar lifetime, while simultaneously losing the outer envelope through winds (Vink et al 2001;Hirschi et al 2005;Vink & de Koter 2005;Woosley & Bloom 2006;Vink et al 2011;Modjaz et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the requirement for a stripped envelope progenitor with a large reserve of angular momentum at corecollapse is understood, the exact nature of the progenitors and the evolutionary pathways which lead to long-duration (core-collapse) GRBs are not well constrained (see Levan et al 2016;Fryer et al 2019, and others for reviews). Models invoking single stars struggle to maintain enough angular momentum over the stellar lifetime, while simultaneously losing the outer envelope through winds (Vink et al 2001;Hirschi et al 2005;Vink & de Koter 2005;Woosley & Bloom 2006;Vink et al 2011;Modjaz et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models propose ways in which this central engine may be formed (e.g. see Fryer et al 2019, and references therein), but the exact mechanism is still unknown.…”
Section: Determining Source Size and Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be even more difficult to tie GRBs to specific massive stars. The black-hole accretion disk (BHAD) paradigm (Popham et al 1999;Fryer et al 1999) for GRBs has both fit existing data and made observational predictions that have been subsequently confirmed (for a review, see Fryer et al 2019). In this paper, we focus on Type I Collapsars, those formed from the so-called direct-collapse scenario of black hole formation (Heger et al 2003) where the black hole forms without launching a supernova explosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As we shall see in our comparison to GRB observations, either this is required or a drastic change in the currently-predicted star history at high redshift (or both) is necessary. Many of the progenitor scenarios for long-duration gamma-ray bursts require binary interactions (for reviews, see Fryer et al 1999Fryer et al , 2007Fryer et al , 2019. If less fragmentation occurs at low metallicities, one might expect fewer binaries and, hence, fewer GRBs (Belczynski et al 2010).…”
Section: Metallicity Effects On Star Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%

Properties of High-Redshift GRBs

Fryer,
Lien,
Fruchter
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite