The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.17239/l1esll-2011.01.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding reading development: A phenomenological perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Favored comprehension strategies are mainly drawn from think-aloud interviews with proficient readers aimed at displaying the strategies they implicitly bring to use in skilled reading (Duke & Pearson, 2002;Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995). It is also suggested that strategies are essential when comprehension is challenging, while for more capable readers, the necessary skills for smooth comprehension are already available, and the need for deliberate and controlled strategy use is much smaller (Afflerbach et al, 2008;Skaftun, 2011). Skaftun (2011) even argues, with reference to recent theoretical development, that competent reading is something more, and something different, than automatized strategy processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Favored comprehension strategies are mainly drawn from think-aloud interviews with proficient readers aimed at displaying the strategies they implicitly bring to use in skilled reading (Duke & Pearson, 2002;Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995). It is also suggested that strategies are essential when comprehension is challenging, while for more capable readers, the necessary skills for smooth comprehension are already available, and the need for deliberate and controlled strategy use is much smaller (Afflerbach et al, 2008;Skaftun, 2011). Skaftun (2011) even argues, with reference to recent theoretical development, that competent reading is something more, and something different, than automatized strategy processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also suggested that strategies are essential when comprehension is challenging, while for more capable readers, the necessary skills for smooth comprehension are already available, and the need for deliberate and controlled strategy use is much smaller (Afflerbach et al, 2008;Skaftun, 2011). Skaftun (2011) even argues, with reference to recent theoretical development, that competent reading is something more, and something different, than automatized strategy processing. Instead, the move towards competent, or proficient, reading is "a shift away from dependency on rules, maxims and plan-making towards holistic recognition and discrimination."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Engasjement er et mangetydig ord, som ofte reduseres til å bety begeistring, og dermed lett knyttes til ytre forhold med underholdningsverdi. Kjernen i ordet er imidlertid nettopp denne formen for kopling mellom individet og det som foregår (Guthrie & Wigfield, 2000;Skaftun, 2011; se også kapittel 4); altså at eleven engasjerer sin egen kunnskap og erfaring i møte med en oppgave eller situasjon. Engasjement i et slikt perspektiv er et mål for elevens utvikling, ikke et middel.…”
Section: Skolens Og Fagenes Literacyunclassified
“…However, it is likely that other factors are involved, such as environment and psychological factors, and hence this model is too simple (Adlof, Catts, & Little, 2006;Berninger, Dunn, Lin, & Shimada, 2004;Høien-Tengesdal, 2010;Quigley, 2018;Verhoeven & Snow, 2001). Further, a purely bottom-up approach to reading fails to take into account topdown (knowledge-driven) approaches (Beard, 1987, p. 24), the connections between the two approaches, and the likelihood that readers employ a variety of strategies (top-down and bottom-up) when reading (Naylor & Wood, 2012, p. 37;Skaftun, 2011). Stafura and Perfetti (2017), building on work in Perfetti (1999) and subsequent studies, attempt to arrive at a wide-angle framework of reading systems taking in both top-down and bottom-up approaches, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%