2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding of mass transfer resistance for the adsorption of solute onto porous material from the modified mass transfer factor models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these fluids, the C/C 0 ratio can extrapolate the boundary of the unit, considering the different adsorption affinities of the various solutes. Curves of this type reflect the phenomenon of sequential exchange, in which a more selective solute is able to remove, from the site, another previously exchanged solute, which is released into the liquid medium [45]. Similar results have been reported by another researcher who used an adsorption process in a multicomponent system [46].…”
Section: Comparing Model Responses and Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these fluids, the C/C 0 ratio can extrapolate the boundary of the unit, considering the different adsorption affinities of the various solutes. Curves of this type reflect the phenomenon of sequential exchange, in which a more selective solute is able to remove, from the site, another previously exchanged solute, which is released into the liquid medium [45]. Similar results have been reported by another researcher who used an adsorption process in a multicomponent system [46].…”
Section: Comparing Model Responses and Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This can be explained by the fact that the diffusion process that controls the adsorption becomes slow, and hence, the adsorbent needs more time to bind with the lactose efficiently. The decrease in the breakthrough time with an increase in the flow rate may be due to a fixed saturation capacity of the bed based on the same driving force giving rise to a shorter time for saturation at higher flow rates [45,47].…”
Section: Comparing Model Responses and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of chitin to remove toxic metals by adsorption has already been reported elsewhere (Jaafarzadeh et al 2014;Karthikeyan et al 2005;Mohan and Syed-Shafi 2013;Sofiane and Sofia 2015;Xiong 2010), but the mechanism has not been fully explained (McKay et al 1999;Volesky 1990). The use of the mass transfer models developed by Fulazzaky et al (2011Fulazzaky et al ( , 2013Fulazzaky et al ( , 2015 for the determination of external, internal and global mass transfer factors can allow us to better understand the adsorption mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 A low RF value of 3.09% obtained during the MCF experiments with injected nutrients may be related to the development of a laboratory conditioning simulation module with the indigenous Geobacillus toebii R-32639 colonies; however, it was not the optimal response. 6,7,[41][42][43] The use of bioproducts (or biosurfactants) in drilling FO during MCF experiments may change the formation wettability from oil-wet to water-wet AC. The difference in RF value between these two techniques should be due to the oil recovery mechanisms involved with MCF experiments; fractured chalk blocks could be dependent on the wettability of the chalk, as the wettability has great impact on the fracture/matrix hydrocarbon exchange, 38,39 while the mechanisms of CO Fig.…”
Section: Microbial Core Ooding Experiments To Increase Crude Oil Promentioning
confidence: 99%