2004
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200300644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Noncovalent Interactions: Ligand Binding Energy and Catalytic Efficiency from Ligand‐Induced Reductions in Motion within Receptors and Enzymes

Abstract: Noncovalent interactions are sometimes treated as additive and this enables useful average binding energies for common interactions in aqueous solution to be derived. However, the additive approach is often not applicable, since noncovalent interactions are often either mutually reinforcing (positively cooperative) or mutually weakening (negatively cooperative). Ligand binding energy is derived (positively cooperative binding) when a ligand reduces motion within a receptor. Similarly, transition-state binding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
322
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
9
322
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooperative binding interactions can be homotropic or heterotropic, when the combined binding to a multivalent receptor involves the same or different types of guests. In additions, these interactions can be positive or negative, when the binding of a guest promotes or obstructs the binding of a second guest (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooperative binding interactions can be homotropic or heterotropic, when the combined binding to a multivalent receptor involves the same or different types of guests. In additions, these interactions can be positive or negative, when the binding of a guest promotes or obstructs the binding of a second guest (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several approaches, the H/D exchange combined with heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy is the most convenient and powerful way because it can provide residue-specific information for most residues (7). For many globular proteins, this approach has identified protected cores, which are often composed of secondary structures buried inside the molecules and the cooperative interactions with partner molecules (4,8), leading to allostery (9). Detailed analyses of exchanges in the native state of cytochrome c in the presence of various concentrations of denaturants suggested a pathway to unfolding, in which groups of secondary structural elements (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also hydrophobic interactions can be dominated by entropy effects rather than enthalpy effects. Generally, the tighter and more directed interactions (eg hydrogen and polar bonds) the less entropic and more enthalpic driven is the interaction [6,24,25].…”
Section: X-ray Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%