Understanding Neighbourhood Dynamics 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4854-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Neighbourhood Population Dynamics for Neighbourhood Effects Research: A Review of Recent Evidence and Data Source Developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most common, from Holtermann (1975) onwards, is that the majority of those who are 'deprived' do not live in 'deprived neighbourhoods'; some would argue that this misses the point since a deprived neighbourhood is more than simply the sum of its residents. Another criticism is that the focus on deprived places obscures the extent to which the deprived population resident within them is highly dynamic, with individuals moving in and out of poverty, and moving in and out of the neighbourhood (Bailey et al 2013;Gambaro et al 2016;Fransham 2017). Aggregate levels of deprivation may mask variations between places in the extent to which they are home to individuals facing long-term poverty or a fast-changing group of people experiencing shorter-term spells.…”
Section: Neighbourhood Policy and Indices Of Multiple Deprivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most common, from Holtermann (1975) onwards, is that the majority of those who are 'deprived' do not live in 'deprived neighbourhoods'; some would argue that this misses the point since a deprived neighbourhood is more than simply the sum of its residents. Another criticism is that the focus on deprived places obscures the extent to which the deprived population resident within them is highly dynamic, with individuals moving in and out of poverty, and moving in and out of the neighbourhood (Bailey et al 2013;Gambaro et al 2016;Fransham 2017). Aggregate levels of deprivation may mask variations between places in the extent to which they are home to individuals facing long-term poverty or a fast-changing group of people experiencing shorter-term spells.…”
Section: Neighbourhood Policy and Indices Of Multiple Deprivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, involuntary staying is characterised by a long-term imbalance between the housing needs of a household and its current residential environment, which creates housing stress (Brown and Moore 1970; see also Bailey et al 2013). In Brown and Moore's (1970) classic relocation model, the first phase is the decision to seek a new residence, which is driven by changed demands concerning the residential environment, that is, the apartment itself and the location factors.…”
Section: Involuntary Staying and Self-rated Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding stems from sociological studies on the effects of neighbourhood characteristics and neighbourhood dynamics on a number of outcomes, such as crime rates, health, and work prospects (Sampson et al, 2002;Van Wilsem et al, 2003, 2006Völker et al, 2013). It has been found that although neighbourhood (dis)order clearly has an impact on its residents' assessment of the neighbourhood and whether they will move, perceived changes in neighbourhood order or reputation are also important (Feijten and van Ham, 2009;Bailey et al, 2013). We expect that local entrepreneurs are even more susceptible to changes in their neighbourhoods' social and physical order than are ordinary residents because neighbourhood conditions may affect not only entrepreneurs' social and personal lives, but also their professional success.…”
Section: Firm-external Determinants Of Firm Success At the Local Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%