2005
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the mutual adaptation between ERP packages and Chinese organizations became a research focus. The literature indicates that fit and localization are issues in the adoption of ERP systems by Chinese firms (Liang and Xue, 2004;Wei et al, 2005;. Moreover, for many Chinese firms, successful implementation of ERP does not offer much assurance for assimilation.…”
Section: Human Behaviors In Is Adoption and Usementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the mutual adaptation between ERP packages and Chinese organizations became a research focus. The literature indicates that fit and localization are issues in the adoption of ERP systems by Chinese firms (Liang and Xue, 2004;Wei et al, 2005;. Moreover, for many Chinese firms, successful implementation of ERP does not offer much assurance for assimilation.…”
Section: Human Behaviors In Is Adoption and Usementioning
confidence: 98%
“…A later body of work argued that the benefits of ERP do not appear for a number of years (Mabert et al 2001). It was therefore necessary, they suggested, to extend the timeframe of research into the 'post-implementation' phase also described as the 'onward and upward' phase (Somers and Nelson 2004;Wei et al 2005;Wu 2008). Elsewhere, echoing some of the sentiments of this latter work, we have drawn attention to the enormous effort involved in bridging generic supplier offerings to specific organisational settings through intertwined processes of innofusion-in adapting these complex information systems to particular organisational settings and of domesticationas organisations learn to exploit the affordances of complex technologies in redeveloping their information and work practices (Pollock and Williams 2009).…”
Section: Implementation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Misalignments were then employed as another criterion for selecting those within-scope modules. 24] by illustrating that in addition to considering the fit between the selected modules and the organization, the social alliance's influence also played an important role in module selection. As top managers opened up space for negotiations about how the SAP-ERP should be integrated routine practices, users, the ERP core team, and SAP consultants engaged in intensive negotiations to establish a new socio-technical order.…”
Section: Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of options, social forces, and negotiations emerge during the process of embedding the global solutions into the application settings. A number of studies report that when implementing global largescale technologies, the reconciliation of structural differences and conflicts are critical but extremely difficult and costly [21][22][23][24][25]. There is dialectic between the global and the local [20,26,27].…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%