2016
DOI: 10.1364/prj.4.000293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding localized surface plasmon resonance with propagative surface plasmon polaritons in optical nanogap antennas

Abstract: The plasmonic nanogap antenna is an efficient radiating or receiving optical device. The resonance behavior of optical antennas is commonly attributed to the excitation of a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), which can be theoretically defined as the quasi-normal mode (QNM). To clarify the physical origin of the LSPR, we build up an analytical model of the LSPR by considering a multiple scattering process of propagative surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) on the antenna arms. The model can comprehensive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with the development of nanotechnology, nanophotonics and plasmonics have drawn much attention over the last few decades. In particular, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) has been extensively investigated because of the wide range of applications [1][2][3][4], including in sensors [5,6], photocurrent conversion [7][8][9][10][11], and artificial photosynthesis [12][13][14]. Recently, many experiments have been reported to provide direct visualization of LSPR using several approaches, such as scanning near-field optical microscopy [15][16][17], cathodoluminescence microscopy [18,19], electron energy-loss spectroscopy [19][20][21][22][23], and photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the development of nanotechnology, nanophotonics and plasmonics have drawn much attention over the last few decades. In particular, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) has been extensively investigated because of the wide range of applications [1][2][3][4], including in sensors [5,6], photocurrent conversion [7][8][9][10][11], and artificial photosynthesis [12][13][14]. Recently, many experiments have been reported to provide direct visualization of LSPR using several approaches, such as scanning near-field optical microscopy [15][16][17], cathodoluminescence microscopy [18,19], electron energy-loss spectroscopy [19][20][21][22][23], and photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the nanogap is very small, the surface plasmon is confined to a small volume, leading to an extremely high maximum enhancement factor. 55 However, the spread of the hotspot shown in Fig. 7(b) decreases as the nanogap size decreases, which results in a deviation of the average enhancement from the maximum enhancement trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The tiny hot spots of 52 nm and 48 nm in diameter at apex of the nanoantenna for reflection and transmission are derived respectively. Two-dimensional arrays of plasmonic nanoantennas can realize a strong radiation in good directionality [13][14]. The annoantenna itself acts as a dipole which collects SPPs energy excited from surface of the sharp cone-shaped antenna and beaming.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%