Understanding Local Policymaking: Policy Elites' Perceptions of Local Agenda Setting and Alternative Policy Selection

Abstract

Despite the increasing interest in policy agenda research in recent years, very few studies have focused their attention on the relevant processes at the local level. Drawing on agenda‐setting research, particularly Kingdon's multiple‐streams framework, this study examines the key forces and factors, as well as their relative importance, in local agenda setting, problem identification, and alternative policy selection. Data are collected from 271 in‐depth interviews with local policy stakeholders in three U.S. Gulf Coast areas. Interview materials are coded using a protocol focused on capturing stakeholders' perceptions of the key elements and forces in local policy dynamics. Our interview data indicate that (i) governmental actors and various interest groups have relatively more influence in shaping local agendas than the general public, experts, and election‐related actors, while the mass media are found to have little agenda‐setting power in local policy processes; (ii) budgetary consideration and various forms of feedback to local government are more important than objective problem indicators and focusing events in setting local policy priorities; (iii) policy alternatives that are deemed compatible with existing policies and regulations are more likely to be selected than those relying on other criteria such as technical feasibility, value acceptability, and future constraints; and (iv) consensus and coalition building is perceived as the most important political factor in local policy processes. Limitations of our study and recommendations for future research are discussed in the concluding section.

Examining climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviours among public sector organisations in the USA

“…Kingdon's original framework has rarely been applied at the local or sub-national government level (for exceptions, see Lieberman (2002) and Liu et al (2010)) and this example will illustrate its utility at this scale.…”

Identifying the Causes of Issue Attention and Policy Change: Evidence from U.S. Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Drilling Policy, 2008

“…18 The report is available on the EIA's website (www.eia.gov). 19 For example, Liu, Lindquist, Vedlitz, and Vincent (2010) demonstrate how attention to climate change in congressional hearings appears linked to increased carbon dioxide emissions. However, this effect is suppressed during periods of Republican congressional majorities.…”

Contrasting between Focusing, Real-world and Significant Events in Agenda-Setting: Introducing a New Typology of “Anchor” Events

“…First, as Liu et al [26] study makes important observations and findings, scholars should empirically test the policy areas and conditions in which focusing events, as compared with other types of attention attractors, exert predominant influence on agenda-setting processes across various jurisdictions. Second, as Birkland [1] demonstrates with regard to the 9/11 terrorist attack in the US, further studies should continue to analyze the impact of similar focusing events in terms of their magnitude of influence on various policies, e.g.…”