2018
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2815004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Land Surface Temperature Differences of Local Climate Zones Based on Airborne Remote Sensing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The order of sUHI intensity of built types showed that the sUHI intensity was closely related to the height of buildings. In general, the lower the building height, the stronger the sUHI intensity, which is consistent with previous studies [54][55][56]. For the same height level, the sUHI intensity in open zones was significantly lower than those in compact zones.…”
Section: Relationship Between Lcz Population Density and Suhisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The order of sUHI intensity of built types showed that the sUHI intensity was closely related to the height of buildings. In general, the lower the building height, the stronger the sUHI intensity, which is consistent with previous studies [54][55][56]. For the same height level, the sUHI intensity in open zones was significantly lower than those in compact zones.…”
Section: Relationship Between Lcz Population Density and Suhisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of the LCZ analysis can be compared with the results of Koc et al (2018). The LCZ8 class was among the warmest in both studies during the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very different results appear during the night when in Olomouc, the water cools relatively well and the industrial zones fail to cool down. Koc et al (2018) reports that water remains the warmest surface and the industrial zones are among the coldest. It would be very interesting to research the connection in thermal behaviour of LCZs in various regions more in depth, especially on cases such as Sydney and Olomouc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct way to determine LCZ classes is to match the calculated values of LCZ parameters with their reference ranges. This method has been most widely used to distinguish LCZs based on the LCZ parameters provided by Stewart & Oke (2012) or custom parameters (Agathangelidis et al, 2019;Bartesaghi Koc et al, 2018, 2017Cai et al, 2019;Emmanuel & Loconsole, 2015;Jin et al, 2020;Leconte et al, 2017Leconte et al, , 2015Mandelmilch et al, 2020;Mitraka et al, 2015;Nassar et al, 2016;Ndetto & Matzarakis, 2015;Perera & Emmanuel, 2018;Shi et al, 2018;Thomas et al, 2014;Villadiego & Velay-Dabat, 2014;Wang et al, 2018b;Zheng et al, 2018). In addition, some studies have used other methods to determine LCZ types, such as the score assignment method (Lelovics et al, 2014;Unger et al, 2014), the decision-making algorithm (Chen et al, 2020b;Quan, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019a), the multi-dimensional linear interpolation method (Quan et al, 2017), the Naive Bayes algorithm (Hammerberg et al, 2018), the random forest algorithm (Hu et al, 2019), and the k-means method (Hidalgo et al, 2019;Kwok et al, 2019;Zhan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Classification Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%