2003
DOI: 10.1086/344125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding International Differences in the Gender Pay Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
384
1
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
16
384
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In fact, women's participation in labor market activities is intimately connected to women's role within the household (Blau 1998, OECD 2002, Blau and Kahn 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In fact, women's participation in labor market activities is intimately connected to women's role within the household (Blau 1998, OECD 2002, Blau and Kahn 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the dominant crossnational approach at the intersection of gender and class focuses gender inequality at work (Gornick 1999;McCall and O'Connor 2005). Many scholars show cross-national variation in sex segregation at work (Chang 2004;Charles 2005;Charles and Grusky 2004), the sex pay gap (Blau and Kahn 2003), or women's labor force participation (Pettit and Hook 2005). Just as the cross-national study of gender and work has made tremendous contributions, we suggest that other intersections of gender and class can inform our understanding of inequality.…”
Section: Nearly Universal But Somewhat Distinct: the Feminization Ofmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Some scholars seem to assert that the extent of societal gender inequality is a function of the extent of overall economic inequality (Blau and Kahn 2003). In an influential paper, Blau and Kahn (1992) showed that countries with greater returns to skill and greater earnings inequality tend to have greater gender pay differences.…”
Section: Coherence or Divergence Between Dimensions Of Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an attempt to explain why gender inequality in Japan is larger than in most other industrialized country including the United States (Blau and Kahn 2003), Brinton (1988:305) proposes the concept of a "human capital development system" in her article "The Social-Institutional Bases of Gender Stratification: Japan as an Illustrative Case" to refer to the ways in which women's and men's human capital accumulation is institutionally structured around gendered family, education, and labor market systems. This system consists of "(1) the social-institutional context of human capital development and evaluation, reflected by the structure of the educational system and the labor market and (2) the structure of exchanges and investment, especially intergenerational ones, within the family as the supplier of labor" (Brinton 1988:305).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%