Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &Amp; Social Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding individuals' personal values from social media word use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
105
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
105
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with studies demonstrating the use of predictive models for measuring personality (Chen, Hsieh, Mahmud, & Nichols, 2014;Lambiotte & Kosinski, 2014;Yarkoni, 2010) and indicates that predictive scoring algorithms are suitable for scoring image-based response scales. Moderate correlations between the image-based and the text-based measures for Curiosity and Openness demonstrated good concurrent validity of the image-based format (r = 0.5, p b 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This finding is in line with studies demonstrating the use of predictive models for measuring personality (Chen, Hsieh, Mahmud, & Nichols, 2014;Lambiotte & Kosinski, 2014;Yarkoni, 2010) and indicates that predictive scoring algorithms are suitable for scoring image-based response scales. Moderate correlations between the image-based and the text-based measures for Curiosity and Openness demonstrated good concurrent validity of the image-based format (r = 0.5, p b 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For deriving personality traits Linguist Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [20] had been used frequently. References [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] have shown that lexicons used by people can be used for understanding their personal values and how to use these traits for a recommendation. Though all these approaches have been used extensively in analyzing personality traits, these also have shortcomings of predefined word category correlation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• match specified (or measured) Big Five personality traits and associated personality facets [8]; match basic human values as described by Schwartz [9] and Chen [10] • match a writer's word choices: favored words, word music, word length, favored mood • match writing patterns: n-grams (2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-grams); an n-gram is a series of n words in a row that has appeared in a naturally occurring, existing text.…”
Section: Mimicking Writersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of personality scores needs to be fast, which is accomplished by pre-computing as much of the LIWC categories as possible and using caches. InkWell also targets values [10], which are computed similarly.…”
Section: Inkwell Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%