2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding genetic diversity of relict forests. Linking long-term isolation legacies and current habitat fragmentation in Abies pinsapo Boiss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the results obtained here underline the persistence of high genetic diversity in C. atlantica (H E = 0.894) and provide no evidence of a recent bottleneck. This result is in line with previous genetic studies that reported a considerably high level of diversity for C. atlantica (Bechir et al 2004;Sękiewicz et al 2018;Bagnoli et al 2020) and other narrow endemic conifers (Eliades et al 2011;Cobo-Simón et al 2020;Dering et al 2014). In fact, this pattern of diversity observed for narrow endemic plants from the Mediterranean is not an exception.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Spatial Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, the results obtained here underline the persistence of high genetic diversity in C. atlantica (H E = 0.894) and provide no evidence of a recent bottleneck. This result is in line with previous genetic studies that reported a considerably high level of diversity for C. atlantica (Bechir et al 2004;Sękiewicz et al 2018;Bagnoli et al 2020) and other narrow endemic conifers (Eliades et al 2011;Cobo-Simón et al 2020;Dering et al 2014). In fact, this pattern of diversity observed for narrow endemic plants from the Mediterranean is not an exception.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity and Spatial Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since AMOVA analysis informed the genetic divergence related to neutral components such as demography, it was worth comparing the results of this work with those obtained in a previous study using neutral markers (SSR) in the same individuals [19]. In that study, the Fst values in S and C ranged between −0.051 and 0.020, similar to those obtained here, with the exception of C by survival in SNPGORK, which showed a high and statistically significant Fst value in this work, using all individuals (Fst = 0.267, FDR = 0.03) (Table 1 and Supplementary Material Table S1), and in six out of the eight alive/dead balanced subsets (Fst = 0.397, p value = 0.021) (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LFMM was a hierarchical Bayesian mixed model, which corrected the underlying population structure, which was introduced into the model via the number of expected clusters (K). Previous population genetic work using microsatellite markers found no evidence of genetic structure in both S and C populations [19]. Thus, K was set to one.…”
Section: Detection Of Selection Signatures and Genetic Structure Related To Altitude Age And Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations