2018
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Fear of Zika: Personal, Interpersonal, and Media Influences

Abstract: Fear of infectious disease often motivates people to protect themselves. But, it can also produce negative bio-social-psychological effects whose severity is on par with those of the disease. The WHO declaration of Zika as a world health crisis presented an opportunity to study factors that bring about fear. Beginning nine days after the WHO announcement, data were gathered from women aged 18-35 living in the southern United States (N = 719). Respondents reported experiencing fear of Zika at levels akin to tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering boundary conditions still seems warranted: community efficacy here was at least marginally significant as an influence on intentions for removal, travel, and post‐travel protection (with household efficacy also significant for all but the last), but not for spraying or safe sex. The latter failure parallels a finding by Yang, Dillard, and Li (): women who knew friends or family who were, or were expecting to become, pregnant did not exhibit higher fear of Zika infection, while their own current or planned pregnancy did heighten fear. The authors speculated that this difference might reflect one's own threats crowding out those to others, but as they had not distinguished fear‐for‐self from fear‐for‐others, they could not rule out other‐relevance effects on fear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Considering boundary conditions still seems warranted: community efficacy here was at least marginally significant as an influence on intentions for removal, travel, and post‐travel protection (with household efficacy also significant for all but the last), but not for spraying or safe sex. The latter failure parallels a finding by Yang, Dillard, and Li (): women who knew friends or family who were, or were expecting to become, pregnant did not exhibit higher fear of Zika infection, while their own current or planned pregnancy did heighten fear. The authors speculated that this difference might reflect one's own threats crowding out those to others, but as they had not distinguished fear‐for‐self from fear‐for‐others, they could not rule out other‐relevance effects on fear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…As Fig 1 makes plain, Zika was the topic of a great deal of media coverage and search behavior. And our previous research shows that media coverage was complemented by frequent interpersonal discussions of the disease [ 43 ]. Hence, one factor that could recreate fear as the contents of mind is repeated exposure to the threatening concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychological models adopted for the Zika outbreak in Brazil and Nipah infection in India involved sex education about the viral transmission among partners, social connectedness, and focusing on alternative forms of expressing love and intimacy, while observing physical distancing. [ 25 26 ] This becomes vital as sexual well-being has been linked with positivity, hope, personal growth, and overall health, especially at times of disasters.…”
Section: Pandemics and Sexual Health: Revisiting The “Pestilences”mentioning
confidence: 99%