Understanding experimentation as improvisation in arts research

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the following questions: in what sense does experimentation as improvisation lead to methodological innovation? What are the implications of artistic experimentation as improvisation for education and learning? Design/methodology/approach – The paper tracks the known concept within research of “experimentation” with a view to revealing how practice-led research in art works distinctively with experimentation. It proposes experimentation as improvisation drawing on a research project Sounding Drawing 2012 as an example. The paper situates art experimentation as improvisation in art (Cage, 1995) anthropology (Hallam and Ingold, 2007; Bateson, 1989) and the theoretical work of Arnheim (1986) on forms of cognition. Findings – Arts research as improvisation is participatory, relational and performative retaining the research subject in its life context. The artist as researcher starts with open-ended critical questions for which there are no known methods or immediate answer. By setting up boundary conditions from the outset and understanding the situatedness and contingencies of those conditions, the artist as improviser seeks ways of not only avoiding chaos and the arbitrary but also being trapped by what is already known. Originality/value – This approach is important within and beyond the arts because it consciously draws together different forms of cognition – intuition and relational knowledge and also sequential knowledge. It is also significant because it offers a different epistemology in which new knowledge emerges in the relationship between participants in the research taking form in co-creation. These qualities all position improvisation as a research paradigm and a counterpoint to positivism.

Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis

“…The second form of cognition is contextual and relational, situated in the way we experience colour, for example—we perceive the colour of an object in relation to its neighbours. (Douglas & Nil Gulari, 2015, p. 399)He goes on to say both forms of cognition are complementary and necessary and are constitutive of cognition in everyday life. Generally, it is found that digital tools support a more sequential form of cognition whereas manual methods and tools support the relational.…”

“…The second form of cognition is contextual and relational, situated in the way we experience colour, for example—we perceive the colour of an object in relation to its neighbours. (Douglas & Nil Gulari, 2015, p. 399)…”

“…To evaluate this impact, it is necessary to look at modes of learning and associated interactions. Douglas and Nil Gulari (2015) claim we learn and understand the world by interacting with and experiencing things in the environment. The knowledge created during the interaction is dependent upon two forms of cognition, sequential, and relational.…”

To care or not to care - reflections on the ethics of blended learning in times of disruption

“…A constructivist and interpretivist epistemology served as the framework for our research (Probst 2016). The research approach that was adopted is described by Probst (2016, 149) as "unusual" by virtue of researchers holding dual roles of providing research data and analysing the data themselves.…”

Transforming Pedagogies: Encouraging Pre-service Teachers to Engage the Power of the Arts in their Approach to Teaching and Learning

“…These stories highlight the power of transgressive behaviours in different forms (Duncum, 2009), the ways in which experimentation and risk-taking impact on learning and creativity (Brown, 2012;Douglas and Gulari, 2015), and the dynamics which influence the pre-service teachers' confidence to articulate opinions, experiment with the arts, and work collaboratively.…”