Understanding Early Childhood Science Education: Comparative Analysis of Australian and Finnish Curricula

Abstract

This research is a comparative study of Finnish and Australian science curricula in early childhood education (EC). The study aims to figure out the constructivist components of the science curriculum in two countries as well as locate the similarities and differences in the rationale and aims, contents, learning outcomes, learning activities, teacher’s role and assessment. The curriculum analysis framework developed by Van den Akker (2003) was used as a methodological framework for the curricula analysis. Based on the theory-driven content analyses, findings show that both countries have several components of constructivist curriculum, but not always clearly focused on science education. The Australian Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) integrates children’s science learning within their five specific learning outcomes, whereas the Finnish national core curriculum for early childhood education and care has no defined learning outcomes in general. The Finnish curriculum more clearly than EYLF encompasses science and environmental education as a learning domain, within which children participate in targeted scientific activities to gain procedural knowledge in specific environmental-related concepts. More focus should be turned to the teachers’ role and assessment, which are not determined in science context in both countries. This international comparative study calls for the need of a considered EC curriculum framework that more explicitly has science domains with specifically defined rationale, aims, content areas, learning outcomes and assessment criteria. The implications lie in providing early childhood educators with tangible and theoretically solid curriculum framework and resources in order to foster scientific thinking in young children.

Children’s digital competence in early childhood education: A comparative analysis of curricula

“…Recent research has shown interesting similarities and differences between the Australian and the Finnish curricula. For example, similarities and differences related to equity and generic competences are debated in primary school level (see Hardy & Uljens, 2018), global citizenship and acceptance of diversity learning in foreign language learning in ECE (Garvis et al, 2018), and integration of learning and teaching delivery in the context of science learning in ECE (Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2022). Since comparative curriculum analysis regarding DC in ECE is rare, it is valuable to find out possible similarities and differences between the Australian and the Finnish ECE curricula texts.…”

Currículo de ciências para o ensino primário: Uma análise comparativa entre Portugal, Inglaterra, Estados Unidos, Austrália e Singapura

“…A nível internacional a preconização do ensino das ciências para todos e desde os primeiros anos tem vindo a ser discutida desde o século XX com a finalidade de contribuir para o desenvolvimento da literacia científica de todos os cidadãos (Harlen & Qualter, 2018;International Science Council, 2021;OCDE, 2006). A educação em ciências desde os primeiros anos contribui para: a interpretação de fenómenos naturais decorrentes do quotidiano das crianças; a compreensão de fenómenos mais complexos em ciclos de ensino subsequentes; o despertar da curiosidade das crianças; e a promoção do gosto pelas ciências (Martins, 2020).…”

Pengembangan Kemampuan Sains Anak melalui Metode Eksperimen di Taman Kanak-Kanak

“…Misalnya, saat mengeksplorasi dan berinteraksi dengan lingkungannya, anak-anak mengembangkan kompetensi penamaan fenomena dan menggunakan konsep yang berbeda, yang mempromosikan pengetahuan dan multiliterasi mereka. Anak belajar menggunakan konsep sains yang berhubungan dengan alam seperti latihan mengidentifikasi spesies tumbuhan (Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2022).…”