Framing Community Disaster Resilience 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119166047.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Disaster Resilience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers argue that conceptualizing community resilience as an adaptive process (Abeling et al, 2019; Norris et al, 2008) can be more beneficial compared with a view of the concept as merely an outcome. Norris et al (2008) defined community resilience as, “a process linking a set of adaptive capacities to a positive trajectory of functioning and adaptation after a disturbance” (p. 130).…”
Section: Developing Community Resilience: Current Theoretical Approac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers argue that conceptualizing community resilience as an adaptive process (Abeling et al, 2019; Norris et al, 2008) can be more beneficial compared with a view of the concept as merely an outcome. Norris et al (2008) defined community resilience as, “a process linking a set of adaptive capacities to a positive trajectory of functioning and adaptation after a disturbance” (p. 130).…”
Section: Developing Community Resilience: Current Theoretical Approac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors analyzed definitions of community resilience and its comprising elements, suggesting that, “resilience is better conceptualized as an ability or process than as an outcome” as well as that, “resilience is better conceptualized as adaptability than as stability” (p. 130). In the same manner, Abeling et al (2019) stated that a dynamic approach to community resilience is less reductionist compared with older, outcome-based approaches, as it paves the way for the exploration of adaptive community processes and to identifying specific indicators. Almedom (2013) also stated that the development of resilience should not be perceived as solely the responsibility of experts and outsiders; rather, it is dependent upon the processes of emergence, self-organization, and self-governance, elements that cannot be taught (Furedi, 2008) but only be enhanced and assisted by interventions through policy and practice.…”
Section: Developing Community Resilience: Current Theoretical Approac...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cutter et al (2014) assert that research on quantifying community resilience is still at the preliminary stage. Even though much efforts has already been made to boost research on community resilience indicator (Cutter et al 2010;Norris et al 2008;Twigg 2009a), there is still no acceptable method for the evaluation of community resilience and there are still challenges in developing real evaluation strategies (Abeling et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many attempts have been made to consolidate research on community resilience (e.g. (Twigg 2009), (Norris et al 2008), (Cutter et al 2010)), no accepted method exists so far and there are still difficulties in developing concrete assessment approaches (Abeling et al 2014). This paper introduces an indicator-based method to compute the resilience of urban communities based on the PEOPLES framework (Cimellaro et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%