2014
DOI: 10.1080/17571472.2014.11493427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding context in healthcare research and development

Abstract: This is a review of a paper by Bayliss et al in the Annals of Family Medicine that argues that traditional research methods 'are not well suited to addressing multi-faceted problems, such as understanding the complex interaction of multi-morbid chronic illness with social, environmental and healthcare systems'. Bayliss et al conclude that research that can be relied on requires methods that are 'participatory, mixed methods, multi-level, and engage communities'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Thomas says in a partner paper in this issue of LJPC, we need to develop a research approach that is adequate to the complex and dynamic nature of primary care. 8 And we need a more nuanced approach to the values underlying healthcare if we are to practise in a truly evidencebased way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Thomas says in a partner paper in this issue of LJPC, we need to develop a research approach that is adequate to the complex and dynamic nature of primary care. 8 And we need a more nuanced approach to the values underlying healthcare if we are to practise in a truly evidencebased way.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to these practices is the idea of context ("Appendix 1: Definitions of Health-Care Settings," 2009; Thomas, 2014). The setting in which individuals perform the care-related activity dictates what constitutes an acceptable and credible approach to care.…”
Section: Contexts For Communicating Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need to consider an alternate research approach in developing outcomes for primary care. 9 We would suggest that this continued failure to focus on outcomes that patients want as well as persistent health inequalities requires a refocusing of our approach towards patient-defined and populationbased health outcomes. This should be particularly true for general practice, a part of the healthcare system traditionally imbuing the values of populationbased care.…”
Section: Measuring What Mattersmentioning
confidence: 99%