2016
DOI: 10.1071/mf16075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding change in the ecological character of Ramsar wetlands: perspectives from a deeper time – synthesis

Abstract: Abstract. The Convention for Wetlands was signed in 1971 as part of a global measure to mitigate the loss and degradation of the world's wetlands. Signatory nations nominate wetlands as internationally important and commit to maintaining their 'ecological character'. In many cases the character that has been maintained was that occurring at the time of nomination with scant attention to the variability and change that occurs over longer periods. Palaeoclimate and palaeoecological research now reveals a diverse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Convention, though, has not provided specific guidance on how to meet these requirements in the context of climate change, such as how to identify appropriate reference conditions Gell et al 2016) and whether past reference conditions were indeed suitable under the changing conditions of the Anthropocene (Kopf et al 2015). This lack of guidance has left important gaps in wetland policy concerning:…”
Section: Ramsar Conventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Convention, though, has not provided specific guidance on how to meet these requirements in the context of climate change, such as how to identify appropriate reference conditions Gell et al 2016) and whether past reference conditions were indeed suitable under the changing conditions of the Anthropocene (Kopf et al 2015). This lack of guidance has left important gaps in wetland policy concerning:…”
Section: Ramsar Conventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers then have a pathway to enact management, whether it be to reduce population size of key predators or competitors, increase emigration rates, fence off areas to allow vegetation recovery, genetically supplement the population and so on. It is, therefore, also very important to identify key risk factors for monitoring (Burgman ; Metcalf & Wallace ; Smith et al ) and to, over time, develop targets and evidence to inform a theory of management, such as a carrying capacity and limits of acceptable change (Rogers et al ; Gell et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conserve a representative range of wetland types, the Convention also relies on a classification system that defines wetland types on the basis of structural and functional categories (Finlayson 2017). However, listing of sites as Wetlands of International Importance has also led some Contracting Parties to emphasise the maintenance of the conservation values at the time of listing, rather than the restoration of previous values or consideration of the history of change in the wetland Gell et al 2016).…”
Section: Current Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is supported by several decisions that recognise this Although not all Contracting Parties use the avoid-mitigatecompensate framework, they do often have a similar framework. However, the Ramsar Convention did not specifically link this framework with efforts to address the impacts of climate change on wetlands, possibly as a consequence of the reticence of the Convention to produce specific guidelines for addressing climate change (Finlayson 2013;Gell et al 2016). The three broad steps in the avoid-mitigate-compensate framework in the context of climate change are outlined below.…”
Section: Setting Objectives and Targets For Wetlands Under Climate Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation