2011
DOI: 10.1021/jz200658h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and Controlling Crosstalk between Parallel Molecular Wires

Abstract: Cooperative effects between molecular wires affect conduction through the wires, and studies have yet to clarify the conditions under which these effects enhance (diminish) conduction. Using a simple but general model, we attribute this crosstalk to the duality of energetic splitting and phase interference between the wires’ conduction channels. In most cases, crosstalk increases (decreases) conductance when the Fermi level is far from (close to) an isolated wire’s resonance. Finally, we discuss strategies for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the calculations support that the linear and cross-conjugated forms, promoted by various local environments, could be the origin of the broad conductance histograms of the D–A molecules, we will now discuss some other possible explanations. Thus, crosstalk and cooperative effects 29 30 31 32 for transport mechanisms between molecular wires connected to the same gold electrodes is relevant to consider. A theoretical study by Dubi 32 is able to explain a lower conductance of molecules in self-assembled monolayers 33 by in-plane dephasing, while Akkerman and de Boer 34 first of all ascribe differences between single-molecule and self-assembled monolayer experiments to a difference in contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the calculations support that the linear and cross-conjugated forms, promoted by various local environments, could be the origin of the broad conductance histograms of the D–A molecules, we will now discuss some other possible explanations. Thus, crosstalk and cooperative effects 29 30 31 32 for transport mechanisms between molecular wires connected to the same gold electrodes is relevant to consider. A theoretical study by Dubi 32 is able to explain a lower conductance of molecules in self-assembled monolayers 33 by in-plane dephasing, while Akkerman and de Boer 34 first of all ascribe differences between single-molecule and self-assembled monolayer experiments to a difference in contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that two molecules are caught in the junction at the same time: Is the current going through the two molecules the same as twice the current through a single molecule? Previous theoretical studies have shown that the transport through two or more molecules connected in parallel (which interact via their joint linkage to the electrodes, or directly with each other) can result in transport that is larger than, equal to, or smaller than twice the transport through a single molecule. This effect can be understood in analogy with an optical double‐slit experiment, where quantum coherence can mix the transport paths, giving twice the conductance for complete constructive interference and close to zero for complete destructive interference.…”
Section: Where We Have Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we can connect the wires in parallel and explore the "cooperative effects" between conduction channels. [83,84,[86][87][88][89][90] Second, we can connect the wires in series and examine the effects of "molecular length" on conductance. [91][92][93][94][95][96][97] We discuss each of these approaches in turn and then comment on their relation to locally ordered molecular materials.…”
Section: Electronic Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These changes in the transmission (per channel) indicate crosstalk between the channels, which is an interference effect between the direct (e.g., pÀp coupling) and electrode-mediated interchannel interactions. [83] Ultimately, the transmission spectra converge as n approaches 1, giving rise to a pseudo-Ohms law, G n parallel = nG 1 eff , in which G n parallel is the conductance through n parallel wires and G 1 eff is an effective one-channel conductance. [84,88] This pseudo-Ohms law has been experimentally validated, [98] and, as suggested in Figure 4a, G 1 eff is not required to be the same as G 1 .…”
Section: Electronic Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%