2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding and addressing seabird bycatch in Alaska demersal longline fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Péron et al 2010), in the absence of trawling activity (moratoria, weekends and calendar holidays). It is worth noticing that in our case the number of hooks per set was unimportant as an explanatory variable, although it has been suggested as a predictor variable (Dietrich et al 2009) and is widely used as a measure of fishing effort (Belda & Sánchez 2001, Bugoni et al 2008a. This is in agreement with Véran et al (2007), who suggested that the relationship between number of hooks per set and fish caught is not always straightforward (but see Báez et al 2007).…”
Section: Modelling Bycatch In the Western Mediterraneansupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Péron et al 2010), in the absence of trawling activity (moratoria, weekends and calendar holidays). It is worth noticing that in our case the number of hooks per set was unimportant as an explanatory variable, although it has been suggested as a predictor variable (Dietrich et al 2009) and is widely used as a measure of fishing effort (Belda & Sánchez 2001, Bugoni et al 2008a. This is in agreement with Véran et al (2007), who suggested that the relationship between number of hooks per set and fish caught is not always straightforward (but see Báez et al 2007).…”
Section: Modelling Bycatch In the Western Mediterraneansupporting
confidence: 78%
“…When trawling discards were not available, Cory's shearwaters were presumably more attracted to the bottom longline fishery, searching for alternative opportunistic food (Oro & Ruiz 1997). According to ZIP models, trawling regime, fishing time and breeding stage were key factors 247 It is worth noticing that in our case the number of hooks per set was unimportant as an explanatory variable, although it has been suggested as a predictor variable (Dietrich et al 2009) and is widely used as a measure of fishing effort (Belda & Sánchez 2001, Bugoni et al 2008a. This is in agreement with Véran et al (2007), who suggested that the relationship between number of hooks per set and fish caught is not always straightforward (but see Báez et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spatio-temporal overlap between seabirds and fisheries is a necessary precondition for bycatch; however, it is not necessarily a good predictor of bycatch at the local (i.e., boat) scale. Factors including individual vessel effects (Dietrich, 2003), time of day (Nel et al, 2002b) or weather conditions (Brothers et al, 1999a) may modulate interaction rates between seabirds and fishery gear. However, at relatively larger scales (e.g., years or regions) and specifically in our study system, annual seabird abundance in the SJDF has been shown to fluctuate in parallel with bycatch rates (Melvin et al, 1999;Melvin et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other well-studied examples of bycatch affecting threatened, endangered, or protected species are turtles caught in a variety of fishing gears (Hall et al 2000;Lewison et al 2004) and seabirds caught by longlines (Melvin et al 2004;Dietrich et al 2009). In both cases the bycatch caused major reductions in population abundance, potentially leading to extinction, and in both cases technical measures were taken to dramatically reduce bycatch mortality.…”
Section: Bycatch and Ecosystem Impacts Of Fishing Gearmentioning
confidence: 99%