When is a fishery sustainable?

Hilborn, Ray; Fulton, Elizabeth A.; Green, Bridget S.; Hartmann, Klaas; Tracey, S; Watson, Reg

doi:10.1139/cjfas-2015-0062

Cited by 117 publications

(94 citation statements)

References 86 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The lack of a comprehensive and well‐defined standard for capture fisheries to meet modern concepts of sustainability across all three environmental, social and economic areas has been noted by Hilborn et al (). These authors argue that, “while there are scientific standards to judge the sustainability of food production, once we examine ecological, social, and economic aspects of sustainability, there is no unique scientific standard.” Even within the fairly well‐defined area of ecosystem‐based fisheries management, where there are international guidelines ( e.g ., FAO code of conduct) as to intent, specific targets and scientific methods of assessing status and performance are largely lacking for anything other than effects on the target stock and assessed by‐catch species.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who determines sustainability?

Agnew

2019

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the past 20 years many different certification or rating schemes for sustainable fisheries have evolved, that attempt to influence consumer tastes and preferences and thereby incentivise better fisheries practices. This short review paper aims to document the history of such schemes, to consider their apparent differences and the basis upon which sustainability standards were developed. While there is some consistency between schemes in terms of the elements that should be considered as part of sustainability, and the general outcomes that sustainable fisheries should strive for, with the exception of maximum sustainable yield (MSY) there is less agreement on the specific details of how this should be measured or what reference points should be considered as sustainable. This arises from a lack of specific consideration or agreement on these issues in the international policy community.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who determines sustainability?

Agnew

2019

Journal of Fish Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Untuk kasus yang lain, dicontohkan bahwa nelayan di Australia juga harus melaporkan setiap interaksi dengan jenis ikan yang terancam punah atau jenis yang dilindungi. Hal itu menunjukkan bahwa konsep berbasis keberlanjutan terhadap pemanfaatan jasa sumber daya perikanan yang lebih luas terus ditingkatkan (Hilborn, 2015). Atas dasar teori di atas, maka dilakukan penentuan indikator sesuai dengan kebutuhan kajian seperti pada Tabel 1.…”

Section: B Permasalahanunclassified

Tinjauan Kebijakan Peraturan Menteri Kelautan Dan Perikanan Nomor 4 Tahun 2015 Di Kecamatan Banda Neira, Kabupaten Maluku Tengah, Provinsi Maluku

Adam

2017

JEKP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation, No. 4/2015 menganalisis dampak teknis, sosial-ekonomi, dan lingkungan dan solusi yang perlu dilakukan akibat terbitnya kebijakan tersebut; serta (c) merumuskan reorientasi kebijakan yang diperlukan. Kajian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Permen KP tersebut tidak didasarkan pada kajian akademis formal yang memadai. Dampak teknis yang ditemukan adalah pelarangan penggunaan pukat cincin sejak tahun 2015 dan modernisasi armada penangkapan hasil perikanan. Dampak sosial-ekonomi yang ditemui adalah pendapatan per kapita nelayan per tahun pada tahun 2015 meningkat 1,46 persen dan tidak ada gejolak sosial di nelayan. Dampak lingkungan, yaitu potensi Ikan Tuna Sirip Kuning tetap stabil dan kesadaran nelayan terhadap lingkungan tinggi. Reorientasi kebijakan pemerintah harus sudah mulai dilakukan yang mengarah pada inklusifitas perikanan. Keberanian pemerintah pusat untuk melakukan pengelolaan perikanan tertutup pada sebuah WPP didasarkan pada dimensi lokasi dan waktu harus bisa diterapkan di WPP yang sudah mengalami tangkap lebih dan daerah tempat bertelur ikan. Namun kebijakan ini harus didukung oleh kajian dan data memadai. Kata kunci: tuna sirip kuning, perikanan berkelanjutan, pengelolaan perikanan tertutup, wilayah pengelolaan perikanan, sumber daya ikan

show abstract

“…Therefore seafood certification schemes for both wild harvest fisheries and aquaculture are proliferating. Such a myriad of certification schemes and standards, including seafood guides, may cause confusion for industry, retailers and even consumers on what the scope of an ecolabel is as well as the rigor associated with its standard and certification processes (Roheim, 2009;Parkes et al, 2010;Hilborn et al, 2015). In an attempt to shed some light on this issue, Tlusty et al…”

Section: Internal Procedures and Alternative Uses Of Certification Stmentioning

confidence: 99%